Positioning and relating: Market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object

J.H. Finch, Susi Geiger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a novel perspective on positioning by dentifying goods and services first as market objects and then as marketing objects. As part of their normal marketing activities marketers position market objects and thereby provide means for other market actors to evaluate differences and similarities across an array of goods and services. Hence, marketers help disentangle goods and services in a market space, so formatting them as market objects. At the same time, marketers tend to make references to cultural and material dimensions in the worlds of producing and consuming goods and services, thereby re-entangling these market objects in the worlds beyond the market and re-formatting them as marketing objects. Drawing on an actor-network theoretical lens, we develop our argument to show that positioning refers to many 'others'; producers and consumers as well as those objects which the market and its calculating frame ignore. We extend our reference beyond market objects through the marketing object to those others, which necessarily are poorly defined, and which suggest complex, contentious and rich alternatives to a market's frames of calculation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages237-251
Number of pages15
JournalMarketing Theory
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Marketing
Positioning
Marketers
Marketing activities
Market position
Actor-network

Keywords

  • actor-network theory
  • boundary object
  • calculation
  • market actor
  • market studies
  • marketing object
  • positioning

Cite this

Finch, J.H. ; Geiger, Susi. / Positioning and relating: Market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object. In: Marketing Theory. 2010 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 237-251.
@article{85ea4d50fa2144dfa3f3fa84c642c616,
title = "Positioning and relating: Market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object",
abstract = "We propose a novel perspective on positioning by dentifying goods and services first as market objects and then as marketing objects. As part of their normal marketing activities marketers position market objects and thereby provide means for other market actors to evaluate differences and similarities across an array of goods and services. Hence, marketers help disentangle goods and services in a market space, so formatting them as market objects. At the same time, marketers tend to make references to cultural and material dimensions in the worlds of producing and consuming goods and services, thereby re-entangling these market objects in the worlds beyond the market and re-formatting them as marketing objects. Drawing on an actor-network theoretical lens, we develop our argument to show that positioning refers to many 'others'; producers and consumers as well as those objects which the market and its calculating frame ignore. We extend our reference beyond market objects through the marketing object to those others, which necessarily are poorly defined, and which suggest complex, contentious and rich alternatives to a market's frames of calculation.",
keywords = "actor-network theory, boundary object, calculation, market actor, market studies, marketing object, positioning",
author = "J.H. Finch and Susi Geiger",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1470593110373188",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "237--251",
journal = "Marketing Theory",
issn = "1470-5931",
number = "3",

}

Positioning and relating: Market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object. / Finch, J.H.; Geiger, Susi.

In: Marketing Theory, Vol. 10, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 237-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positioning and relating: Market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object

AU - Finch, J.H.

AU - Geiger, Susi

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - We propose a novel perspective on positioning by dentifying goods and services first as market objects and then as marketing objects. As part of their normal marketing activities marketers position market objects and thereby provide means for other market actors to evaluate differences and similarities across an array of goods and services. Hence, marketers help disentangle goods and services in a market space, so formatting them as market objects. At the same time, marketers tend to make references to cultural and material dimensions in the worlds of producing and consuming goods and services, thereby re-entangling these market objects in the worlds beyond the market and re-formatting them as marketing objects. Drawing on an actor-network theoretical lens, we develop our argument to show that positioning refers to many 'others'; producers and consumers as well as those objects which the market and its calculating frame ignore. We extend our reference beyond market objects through the marketing object to those others, which necessarily are poorly defined, and which suggest complex, contentious and rich alternatives to a market's frames of calculation.

AB - We propose a novel perspective on positioning by dentifying goods and services first as market objects and then as marketing objects. As part of their normal marketing activities marketers position market objects and thereby provide means for other market actors to evaluate differences and similarities across an array of goods and services. Hence, marketers help disentangle goods and services in a market space, so formatting them as market objects. At the same time, marketers tend to make references to cultural and material dimensions in the worlds of producing and consuming goods and services, thereby re-entangling these market objects in the worlds beyond the market and re-formatting them as marketing objects. Drawing on an actor-network theoretical lens, we develop our argument to show that positioning refers to many 'others'; producers and consumers as well as those objects which the market and its calculating frame ignore. We extend our reference beyond market objects through the marketing object to those others, which necessarily are poorly defined, and which suggest complex, contentious and rich alternatives to a market's frames of calculation.

KW - actor-network theory

KW - boundary object

KW - calculation

KW - market actor

KW - market studies

KW - marketing object

KW - positioning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956210896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1470593110373188

DO - 10.1177/1470593110373188

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 237

EP - 251

JO - Marketing Theory

T2 - Marketing Theory

JF - Marketing Theory

SN - 1470-5931

IS - 3

ER -