Politicians, voters and democracy: the 2011 UK referendum on the alternative vote

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At the 2010 UK election, Labour proposed a referendum on changing the House of Commons electoral system from single member plurality to the Alternative Vote. Subsequently, a coalition was formed between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, yet it was Labour's policy on electoral reform that was implemented. The paper explains why this proved to be politically convenient for Labour's opponents. At the same time, however, holding the referendum reflected an emergent de facto convention that significant constitutional change should only be introduced after it has secured popular endorsement. The paper assesses whether the dynamics of public opinion during the AV referendum suggests that voters' eventual decisions about constitutional questions reflect their views about the merits of the relevant arguments.
LanguageEnglish
JournalElectoral Studies
Early online date23 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

referendum
politician
voter
democracy
labor
labor policy
electoral system
public opinion
coalition
election
reform

Keywords

  • referendums
  • electoral reform
  • alternative vote
  • coalitions
  • party cues

Cite this

@article{cafdfa509e38442598e179e4a75bad67,
title = "Politicians, voters and democracy: the 2011 UK referendum on the alternative vote",
abstract = "At the 2010 UK election, Labour proposed a referendum on changing the House of Commons electoral system from single member plurality to the Alternative Vote. Subsequently, a coalition was formed between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, yet it was Labour's policy on electoral reform that was implemented. The paper explains why this proved to be politically convenient for Labour's opponents. At the same time, however, holding the referendum reflected an emergent de facto convention that significant constitutional change should only be introduced after it has secured popular endorsement. The paper assesses whether the dynamics of public opinion during the AV referendum suggests that voters' eventual decisions about constitutional questions reflect their views about the merits of the relevant arguments.",
keywords = "referendums, electoral reform, alternative vote, coalitions, party cues",
author = "John Curtice",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.010",
language = "English",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politicians, voters and democracy

T2 - Electoral Studies

AU - Curtice, John

PY - 2013/1/23

Y1 - 2013/1/23

N2 - At the 2010 UK election, Labour proposed a referendum on changing the House of Commons electoral system from single member plurality to the Alternative Vote. Subsequently, a coalition was formed between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, yet it was Labour's policy on electoral reform that was implemented. The paper explains why this proved to be politically convenient for Labour's opponents. At the same time, however, holding the referendum reflected an emergent de facto convention that significant constitutional change should only be introduced after it has secured popular endorsement. The paper assesses whether the dynamics of public opinion during the AV referendum suggests that voters' eventual decisions about constitutional questions reflect their views about the merits of the relevant arguments.

AB - At the 2010 UK election, Labour proposed a referendum on changing the House of Commons electoral system from single member plurality to the Alternative Vote. Subsequently, a coalition was formed between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, yet it was Labour's policy on electoral reform that was implemented. The paper explains why this proved to be politically convenient for Labour's opponents. At the same time, however, holding the referendum reflected an emergent de facto convention that significant constitutional change should only be introduced after it has secured popular endorsement. The paper assesses whether the dynamics of public opinion during the AV referendum suggests that voters' eventual decisions about constitutional questions reflect their views about the merits of the relevant arguments.

KW - referendums

KW - electoral reform

KW - alternative vote

KW - coalitions

KW - party cues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876110593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.010

M3 - Article

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

ER -