Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere: the performative play of alignments

Michael Higgins, Martin Montgomery, Angela Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores developing concerns about the rise of offensiveness in the political public sphere and more especially in social media. We argue that current iterations of purposeful political offence should be considered in the context of a number of factors. The first of these is a rise of “post-truth” politics (Montgomery, 2017), in which impressions of personal authenticity take the place of facts and truth becomes less important than ‘speaking your mind’. The second factor is the ascendency of short-form social media such as Twitter and Instagram, which disperse and fragment the discourse of political elites in a setting in which particular “authentic” styles prevail and in which relatively unrestricted access enables multi-articulated tactics of address. The chapter explores how examples of offensiveness in the agonistic political domain (see Ong) may have similar qualities to those “ritual insults” identified by Labov (1972), arguing, indeed, that like Labov’s examples they have a doubly-articulated quality. In the public sphere, however, they can rehearse the core beliefs of a supporting ingroup, and choreographing expressions of alignment for them, while at the same time offensively provoking an “offended” outgroup."
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publication Media and the Politics of Offence
EditorsAnne Graefer
Place of PublicationBasingstoke
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

social media
twitter
outgroup
political elite
authenticity
tactics
speaking
religious behavior
offense
politics
discourse

Keywords

  • political public sphere
  • personal authenticity
  • offensiveness

Cite this

Higgins, M., Montgomery, M., & Smith, A. (2019). Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere: the performative play of alignments. In A. Graefer (Ed.), Media and the Politics of Offence Basingstoke. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0
Higgins, Michael ; Montgomery, Martin ; Smith, Angela. / Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere : the performative play of alignments. Media and the Politics of Offence. editor / Anne Graefer . Basingstoke, 2019.
@inbook{8eaeb6b8444c4782b33078c44529e281,
title = "Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere: the performative play of alignments",
abstract = "This chapter explores developing concerns about the rise of offensiveness in the political public sphere and more especially in social media. We argue that current iterations of purposeful political offence should be considered in the context of a number of factors. The first of these is a rise of “post-truth” politics (Montgomery, 2017), in which impressions of personal authenticity take the place of facts and truth becomes less important than ‘speaking your mind’. The second factor is the ascendency of short-form social media such as Twitter and Instagram, which disperse and fragment the discourse of political elites in a setting in which particular “authentic” styles prevail and in which relatively unrestricted access enables multi-articulated tactics of address. The chapter explores how examples of offensiveness in the agonistic political domain (see Ong) may have similar qualities to those “ritual insults” identified by Labov (1972), arguing, indeed, that like Labov’s examples they have a doubly-articulated quality. In the public sphere, however, they can rehearse the core beliefs of a supporting ingroup, and choreographing expressions of alignment for them, while at the same time offensively provoking an “offended” outgroup.{"}",
keywords = "political public sphere, personal authenticity, offensiveness",
author = "Michael Higgins and Martin Montgomery and Angela Smith",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030175733",
editor = "{Graefer }, Anne",
booktitle = "Media and the Politics of Offence",

}

Higgins, M, Montgomery, M & Smith, A 2019, Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere: the performative play of alignments. in A Graefer (ed.), Media and the Politics of Offence. Basingstoke. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0

Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere : the performative play of alignments. / Higgins, Michael; Montgomery, Martin; Smith, Angela.

Media and the Politics of Offence. ed. / Anne Graefer . Basingstoke, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere

T2 - the performative play of alignments

AU - Higgins, Michael

AU - Montgomery, Martin

AU - Smith, Angela

PY - 2019/8/14

Y1 - 2019/8/14

N2 - This chapter explores developing concerns about the rise of offensiveness in the political public sphere and more especially in social media. We argue that current iterations of purposeful political offence should be considered in the context of a number of factors. The first of these is a rise of “post-truth” politics (Montgomery, 2017), in which impressions of personal authenticity take the place of facts and truth becomes less important than ‘speaking your mind’. The second factor is the ascendency of short-form social media such as Twitter and Instagram, which disperse and fragment the discourse of political elites in a setting in which particular “authentic” styles prevail and in which relatively unrestricted access enables multi-articulated tactics of address. The chapter explores how examples of offensiveness in the agonistic political domain (see Ong) may have similar qualities to those “ritual insults” identified by Labov (1972), arguing, indeed, that like Labov’s examples they have a doubly-articulated quality. In the public sphere, however, they can rehearse the core beliefs of a supporting ingroup, and choreographing expressions of alignment for them, while at the same time offensively provoking an “offended” outgroup."

AB - This chapter explores developing concerns about the rise of offensiveness in the political public sphere and more especially in social media. We argue that current iterations of purposeful political offence should be considered in the context of a number of factors. The first of these is a rise of “post-truth” politics (Montgomery, 2017), in which impressions of personal authenticity take the place of facts and truth becomes less important than ‘speaking your mind’. The second factor is the ascendency of short-form social media such as Twitter and Instagram, which disperse and fragment the discourse of political elites in a setting in which particular “authentic” styles prevail and in which relatively unrestricted access enables multi-articulated tactics of address. The chapter explores how examples of offensiveness in the agonistic political domain (see Ong) may have similar qualities to those “ritual insults” identified by Labov (1972), arguing, indeed, that like Labov’s examples they have a doubly-articulated quality. In the public sphere, however, they can rehearse the core beliefs of a supporting ingroup, and choreographing expressions of alignment for them, while at the same time offensively provoking an “offended” outgroup."

KW - political public sphere

KW - personal authenticity

KW - offensiveness

UR - https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030175733

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783030175733

SN - 9783030175740

BT - Media and the Politics of Offence

A2 - Graefer , Anne

CY - Basingstoke

ER -

Higgins M, Montgomery M, Smith A. Political offensiveness in the mediated public sphere: the performative play of alignments. In Graefer A, editor, Media and the Politics of Offence. Basingstoke. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17574-0