Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime

David Learmonth, J Kim Swales

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

The present UK government has begun a radical overhaul of regional policy, as outlined in HM Treasury (2001) and HM Treasury et al (2003). One particular change is the decentralisation and delegation of regional policy delivery in England to Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) that are motivated and controlled through target setting (McVittie and Swales, 2004a). A major argument for decentralisation is that indigenous institutions have informational advantages over central government in the delivery of a flexible and discretionary regional policy that is sensitive to local economic conditions (HM Treasury et al., (2003). The specific concern in this paper is the co-ordination difficulties within such a regime where there are policy spillovers across regions and where these spillovers are not common knowledge amongst the government and the delegated agencies. At present although the English regions are extremely open, so that spillover effects are to be expected, there is no consensus as to the size or even the sign of such effects. Past work on identifying regional policy spillovers has not focussed on the impact on non-recipient regions or the nation as a whole (Taylor, 2002). What is more, the data on some of the channels through which such spillovers might act, in particular inter-regional trade and migration, are poor (Alsopp, 2003, McVittie and Swales, 2004b).
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-28
Number of pages29
Volume04
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

regional policy
regime
decentralization
regional trade
spillover effect
common knowledge
present
economic conditions
regional development
migration
policy
target setting
economics

Keywords

  • targets
  • regional policy
  • regional development agencies
  • spatial spillovers
  • economics

Cite this

Learmonth, D., & Swales, J. K. (2004). Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime. (24 ed.) (pp. 1-28). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Learmonth, David ; Swales, J Kim. / Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime. 24. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2004. pp. 1-28
@techreport{12b7ac5160484b99af4ac07a900f0f56,
title = "Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime",
abstract = "The present UK government has begun a radical overhaul of regional policy, as outlined in HM Treasury (2001) and HM Treasury et al (2003). One particular change is the decentralisation and delegation of regional policy delivery in England to Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) that are motivated and controlled through target setting (McVittie and Swales, 2004a). A major argument for decentralisation is that indigenous institutions have informational advantages over central government in the delivery of a flexible and discretionary regional policy that is sensitive to local economic conditions (HM Treasury et al., (2003). The specific concern in this paper is the co-ordination difficulties within such a regime where there are policy spillovers across regions and where these spillovers are not common knowledge amongst the government and the delegated agencies. At present although the English regions are extremely open, so that spillover effects are to be expected, there is no consensus as to the size or even the sign of such effects. Past work on identifying regional policy spillovers has not focussed on the impact on non-recipient regions or the nation as a whole (Taylor, 2002). What is more, the data on some of the channels through which such spillovers might act, in particular inter-regional trade and migration, are poor (Alsopp, 2003, McVittie and Swales, 2004b).",
keywords = "targets, regional policy, regional development agencies, spatial spillovers, economics",
author = "David Learmonth and Swales, {J Kim}",
note = "Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 04-24 (2004)",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "04",
pages = "1--28",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
edition = "24",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Learmonth, D & Swales, JK 2004 'Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime' 24 edn, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 1-28.

Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime. / Learmonth, David; Swales, J Kim.

24. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2004. p. 1-28.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime

AU - Learmonth, David

AU - Swales, J Kim

N1 - Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 04-24 (2004)

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The present UK government has begun a radical overhaul of regional policy, as outlined in HM Treasury (2001) and HM Treasury et al (2003). One particular change is the decentralisation and delegation of regional policy delivery in England to Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) that are motivated and controlled through target setting (McVittie and Swales, 2004a). A major argument for decentralisation is that indigenous institutions have informational advantages over central government in the delivery of a flexible and discretionary regional policy that is sensitive to local economic conditions (HM Treasury et al., (2003). The specific concern in this paper is the co-ordination difficulties within such a regime where there are policy spillovers across regions and where these spillovers are not common knowledge amongst the government and the delegated agencies. At present although the English regions are extremely open, so that spillover effects are to be expected, there is no consensus as to the size or even the sign of such effects. Past work on identifying regional policy spillovers has not focussed on the impact on non-recipient regions or the nation as a whole (Taylor, 2002). What is more, the data on some of the channels through which such spillovers might act, in particular inter-regional trade and migration, are poor (Alsopp, 2003, McVittie and Swales, 2004b).

AB - The present UK government has begun a radical overhaul of regional policy, as outlined in HM Treasury (2001) and HM Treasury et al (2003). One particular change is the decentralisation and delegation of regional policy delivery in England to Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) that are motivated and controlled through target setting (McVittie and Swales, 2004a). A major argument for decentralisation is that indigenous institutions have informational advantages over central government in the delivery of a flexible and discretionary regional policy that is sensitive to local economic conditions (HM Treasury et al., (2003). The specific concern in this paper is the co-ordination difficulties within such a regime where there are policy spillovers across regions and where these spillovers are not common knowledge amongst the government and the delegated agencies. At present although the English regions are extremely open, so that spillover effects are to be expected, there is no consensus as to the size or even the sign of such effects. Past work on identifying regional policy spillovers has not focussed on the impact on non-recipient regions or the nation as a whole (Taylor, 2002). What is more, the data on some of the channels through which such spillovers might act, in particular inter-regional trade and migration, are poor (Alsopp, 2003, McVittie and Swales, 2004b).

KW - targets

KW - regional policy

KW - regional development agencies

KW - spatial spillovers

KW - economics

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 04

SP - 1

EP - 28

BT - Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Learmonth D, Swales JK. Policy Spillovers in a Regional Target-Setting Regime. 24 ed. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. 2004, p. 1-28.