‘Policy scepticism’ and the impact of Scottish higher education institutions (HEIs) on their host region: accounting for regional budget constraints under devolution

Kristinn Hermannsson, Katerina Lisenkova, Peter McGregor, John Swales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A “policy scepticism” has emerged that challenges the results of conventional regional HEI impact analyses. Its denial of the importance of the expenditure impacts of HEIs appears to be based on a belief in either a binding regional resource constraint or a regional public sector budget constraint. In this paper we provide a systematic critique of this policy scepticism. However, while rejecting the extreme form of policy scepticism, we argue that it is crucial to recognise the importance of the public-sector expenditure constraints that are binding under devolution. We show how conventional impact analyses can be augmented to accommodate regional public sector budget constraints. While our results suggest that conventional impact studies overestimate the expenditure impacts of HEIs, they also demonstrate that the policy scepticism that treats these expenditure effects as irrelevant neglects some key aspects of HEIs, in particular their export intensity.
LanguageEnglish
Pagesn/a
Number of pages18
JournalRegional Studies
Volumen/a
Issue numbern/a
Early online date12 Jul 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

devolution
higher education
decentralization
expenditure
budget
public sector
expenditures
education
neglect
policy
Higher education institutions
Skepticism
Budget constraint
Expenditure
Devolution
resource
Public sector
resources

Keywords

  • Higher Education Institutions
  • Scotland
  • impact study
  • multipliers
  • public-sector expenditure
  • devolution

Cite this

@article{37ffae3953954855b366fb09002410a4,
title = "‘Policy scepticism’ and the impact of Scottish higher education institutions (HEIs) on their host region: accounting for regional budget constraints under devolution",
abstract = "A “policy scepticism” has emerged that challenges the results of conventional regional HEI impact analyses. Its denial of the importance of the expenditure impacts of HEIs appears to be based on a belief in either a binding regional resource constraint or a regional public sector budget constraint. In this paper we provide a systematic critique of this policy scepticism. However, while rejecting the extreme form of policy scepticism, we argue that it is crucial to recognise the importance of the public-sector expenditure constraints that are binding under devolution. We show how conventional impact analyses can be augmented to accommodate regional public sector budget constraints. While our results suggest that conventional impact studies overestimate the expenditure impacts of HEIs, they also demonstrate that the policy scepticism that treats these expenditure effects as irrelevant neglects some key aspects of HEIs, in particular their export intensity.",
keywords = "Higher Education Institutions, Scotland, impact study , multipliers, public-sector expenditure, devolution",
author = "Kristinn Hermannsson and Katerina Lisenkova and Peter McGregor and John Swales",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/00343404.2012.697139",
language = "English",
volume = "n/a",
pages = "n/a",
journal = "Regional Studies",
issn = "0034-3404",
number = "n/a",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Policy scepticism’ and the impact of Scottish higher education institutions (HEIs) on their host region

T2 - Regional Studies

AU - Hermannsson, Kristinn

AU - Lisenkova, Katerina

AU - McGregor, Peter

AU - Swales, John

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A “policy scepticism” has emerged that challenges the results of conventional regional HEI impact analyses. Its denial of the importance of the expenditure impacts of HEIs appears to be based on a belief in either a binding regional resource constraint or a regional public sector budget constraint. In this paper we provide a systematic critique of this policy scepticism. However, while rejecting the extreme form of policy scepticism, we argue that it is crucial to recognise the importance of the public-sector expenditure constraints that are binding under devolution. We show how conventional impact analyses can be augmented to accommodate regional public sector budget constraints. While our results suggest that conventional impact studies overestimate the expenditure impacts of HEIs, they also demonstrate that the policy scepticism that treats these expenditure effects as irrelevant neglects some key aspects of HEIs, in particular their export intensity.

AB - A “policy scepticism” has emerged that challenges the results of conventional regional HEI impact analyses. Its denial of the importance of the expenditure impacts of HEIs appears to be based on a belief in either a binding regional resource constraint or a regional public sector budget constraint. In this paper we provide a systematic critique of this policy scepticism. However, while rejecting the extreme form of policy scepticism, we argue that it is crucial to recognise the importance of the public-sector expenditure constraints that are binding under devolution. We show how conventional impact analyses can be augmented to accommodate regional public sector budget constraints. While our results suggest that conventional impact studies overestimate the expenditure impacts of HEIs, they also demonstrate that the policy scepticism that treats these expenditure effects as irrelevant neglects some key aspects of HEIs, in particular their export intensity.

KW - Higher Education Institutions

KW - Scotland

KW - impact study

KW - multipliers

KW - public-sector expenditure

KW - devolution

U2 - 10.1080/00343404.2012.697139

DO - 10.1080/00343404.2012.697139

M3 - Article

VL - n/a

SP - n/a

JO - Regional Studies

JF - Regional Studies

SN - 0034-3404

IS - n/a

ER -