Abstract
This article explores why policy makers in England and Scotland responded so differently to the Clackmannanshire study on synthetic phonics. It suggests that a deeper understanding of the national and local policy contexts can explain Scotland's response. Analysis of the wider context of the Clackmannanshire initiative supports Moss and Huxford's (2007) argument that literacy problems cannot be couched within a single paradigm's field of reference, and that policy makers need to consider evidence from different paradigms if they are to make robust decisions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 281-297 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Early Childhood Literacy |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2007 |
Keywords
- Clackmannanshire
- curriculum policy
- early intervention
- staff development
- synthetic phonics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Policy and research: Lessons from the Clackmannanshire synthetic phonics initiative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Impacts
-
Influencing Professional and Public Debate on Phonics and Literacy Teaching
Susan Ellis (Participant)
Impact: Impact - for External Portal › Public understanding, information and debate