Plastic load evaluation for a fixed tube sheet heat exchanger subject to proportional loading

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The plastic load of pressurised components can be calculated based on both the twice elastic slope and tangent methods. Both methods are problematic since they rely on parameters that are localised and therefore have a strong dependency on the gradient of the stress–strain diagram in the plastic region. The criterion of curvature of plastic work is a suitable replacement for the above techniques. This method calculates total plastic work done on the structure and relates its change to the curvature of the load-plastic work plot. In this work the plastic load has been calculated for a fixed tube sheet exchanger according to curvature criteria using various hardening scenarios. Plastic loads calculated by other methods also have been reported. It has been indicated that tube sheet thickness calculated according to the classical ASME procedure can be significantly reduced when based on the curvature criteria.

LanguageEnglish
Pages11-18
JournalInternational Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
Volume92
Early online date13 Dec 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Heat exchangers
Plastics
Hardening

Keywords

  • plastic load
  • heat exchanger
  • fixed tube sheet
  • proportional loading

Cite this

@article{835bb278b82a438ca1b7d3b27cbd9d37,
title = "Plastic load evaluation for a fixed tube sheet heat exchanger subject to proportional loading",
abstract = "The plastic load of pressurised components can be calculated based on both the twice elastic slope and tangent methods. Both methods are problematic since they rely on parameters that are localised and therefore have a strong dependency on the gradient of the stress–strain diagram in the plastic region. The criterion of curvature of plastic work is a suitable replacement for the above techniques. This method calculates total plastic work done on the structure and relates its change to the curvature of the load-plastic work plot. In this work the plastic load has been calculated for a fixed tube sheet exchanger according to curvature criteria using various hardening scenarios. Plastic loads calculated by other methods also have been reported. It has been indicated that tube sheet thickness calculated according to the classical ASME procedure can be significantly reduced when based on the curvature criteria.",
keywords = "plastic load, heat exchanger, fixed tube sheet , proportional loading",
author = "Khosrow Behseta and Donald Mackenzie and Robert Hamilton",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "11--18",
journal = "International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping",
issn = "0308-0161",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plastic load evaluation for a fixed tube sheet heat exchanger subject to proportional loading

AU - Behseta, Khosrow

AU - Mackenzie, Donald

AU - Hamilton, Robert

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - The plastic load of pressurised components can be calculated based on both the twice elastic slope and tangent methods. Both methods are problematic since they rely on parameters that are localised and therefore have a strong dependency on the gradient of the stress–strain diagram in the plastic region. The criterion of curvature of plastic work is a suitable replacement for the above techniques. This method calculates total plastic work done on the structure and relates its change to the curvature of the load-plastic work plot. In this work the plastic load has been calculated for a fixed tube sheet exchanger according to curvature criteria using various hardening scenarios. Plastic loads calculated by other methods also have been reported. It has been indicated that tube sheet thickness calculated according to the classical ASME procedure can be significantly reduced when based on the curvature criteria.

AB - The plastic load of pressurised components can be calculated based on both the twice elastic slope and tangent methods. Both methods are problematic since they rely on parameters that are localised and therefore have a strong dependency on the gradient of the stress–strain diagram in the plastic region. The criterion of curvature of plastic work is a suitable replacement for the above techniques. This method calculates total plastic work done on the structure and relates its change to the curvature of the load-plastic work plot. In this work the plastic load has been calculated for a fixed tube sheet exchanger according to curvature criteria using various hardening scenarios. Plastic loads calculated by other methods also have been reported. It has been indicated that tube sheet thickness calculated according to the classical ASME procedure can be significantly reduced when based on the curvature criteria.

KW - plastic load

KW - heat exchanger

KW - fixed tube sheet

KW - proportional loading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858278962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016111001694

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 11

EP - 18

JO - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

T2 - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

JF - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

SN - 0308-0161

ER -