Placing research: 'city publics' and the 'public sociologist'

Yvette Taylor, Michelle Addison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article raises questions about who becomes the proper subject for (non)academic attention in a time when 'city publics' might be positioned as democratising and open or, conversely, as curtailed and shaped through specific and pre-determined economies of value and use. The use of the city and its residents are echoed in regeneration politics and objectives, attached to and brought forward by specific 'regenerative' subjects, now deemed 'resilient' and capacitated. Such rhetorics of inclusion and measurable impact are echoed within ideas of a 'public sociology', which the engaged researcher should practice as she reengages differently located spaces and subjects. Here, questions are raised about the place of a 'public sociology' as part of a 'city publics', where understanding local disseminations and disparities is important in considering where different users, interviewees and indeed researchers are coming from. Having situated the fieldwork site, we initially focus on the expert advisory group and their constructions of the project's 'use-value'. We then consider the background 'shadows' in and out of 'expert' space, as a trailing presence of research intentions and trajectories. Ideas of public sociology - as with an open 'city publics'-often assumes that all users are interested, willing to hear and appear as equal members of a 'community'. In contrast, the experience of engaging a user group may involve dis-engaging the research-researcher researched and here we provide disruptions to a straightforward 'travelling through' research space as we walk through our research methodologies. This article presents professional and personal reflections on research experience as well as interpretative accounts of navigating fieldwork and city space.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
JournalSociological Research Online
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2011

Fingerprint

sociologist
sociology
expert
Values
rhetoric
experience
Group
inclusion
resident
economy
politics
methodology
community

Keywords

  • public sociology
  • use
  • impact
  • city publics
  • class
  • gender

Cite this

@article{b18c751d1c6d4977ba6dfeba16c2ef5a,
title = "Placing research: 'city publics' and the 'public sociologist'",
abstract = "This article raises questions about who becomes the proper subject for (non)academic attention in a time when 'city publics' might be positioned as democratising and open or, conversely, as curtailed and shaped through specific and pre-determined economies of value and use. The use of the city and its residents are echoed in regeneration politics and objectives, attached to and brought forward by specific 'regenerative' subjects, now deemed 'resilient' and capacitated. Such rhetorics of inclusion and measurable impact are echoed within ideas of a 'public sociology', which the engaged researcher should practice as she reengages differently located spaces and subjects. Here, questions are raised about the place of a 'public sociology' as part of a 'city publics', where understanding local disseminations and disparities is important in considering where different users, interviewees and indeed researchers are coming from. Having situated the fieldwork site, we initially focus on the expert advisory group and their constructions of the project's 'use-value'. We then consider the background 'shadows' in and out of 'expert' space, as a trailing presence of research intentions and trajectories. Ideas of public sociology - as with an open 'city publics'-often assumes that all users are interested, willing to hear and appear as equal members of a 'community'. In contrast, the experience of engaging a user group may involve dis-engaging the research-researcher researched and here we provide disruptions to a straightforward 'travelling through' research space as we walk through our research methodologies. This article presents professional and personal reflections on research experience as well as interpretative accounts of navigating fieldwork and city space.",
keywords = "public sociology, use, impact , city publics, class, gender",
author = "Yvette Taylor and Michelle Addison",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.5153/sro.2423",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Sociological Research Online",
issn = "1360-7804",
number = "4",

}

Placing research : 'city publics' and the 'public sociologist'. / Taylor, Yvette; Addison, Michelle.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 16, No. 4, 30.11.2011, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Placing research

T2 - Sociological Research Online

AU - Taylor, Yvette

AU - Addison, Michelle

PY - 2011/11/30

Y1 - 2011/11/30

N2 - This article raises questions about who becomes the proper subject for (non)academic attention in a time when 'city publics' might be positioned as democratising and open or, conversely, as curtailed and shaped through specific and pre-determined economies of value and use. The use of the city and its residents are echoed in regeneration politics and objectives, attached to and brought forward by specific 'regenerative' subjects, now deemed 'resilient' and capacitated. Such rhetorics of inclusion and measurable impact are echoed within ideas of a 'public sociology', which the engaged researcher should practice as she reengages differently located spaces and subjects. Here, questions are raised about the place of a 'public sociology' as part of a 'city publics', where understanding local disseminations and disparities is important in considering where different users, interviewees and indeed researchers are coming from. Having situated the fieldwork site, we initially focus on the expert advisory group and their constructions of the project's 'use-value'. We then consider the background 'shadows' in and out of 'expert' space, as a trailing presence of research intentions and trajectories. Ideas of public sociology - as with an open 'city publics'-often assumes that all users are interested, willing to hear and appear as equal members of a 'community'. In contrast, the experience of engaging a user group may involve dis-engaging the research-researcher researched and here we provide disruptions to a straightforward 'travelling through' research space as we walk through our research methodologies. This article presents professional and personal reflections on research experience as well as interpretative accounts of navigating fieldwork and city space.

AB - This article raises questions about who becomes the proper subject for (non)academic attention in a time when 'city publics' might be positioned as democratising and open or, conversely, as curtailed and shaped through specific and pre-determined economies of value and use. The use of the city and its residents are echoed in regeneration politics and objectives, attached to and brought forward by specific 'regenerative' subjects, now deemed 'resilient' and capacitated. Such rhetorics of inclusion and measurable impact are echoed within ideas of a 'public sociology', which the engaged researcher should practice as she reengages differently located spaces and subjects. Here, questions are raised about the place of a 'public sociology' as part of a 'city publics', where understanding local disseminations and disparities is important in considering where different users, interviewees and indeed researchers are coming from. Having situated the fieldwork site, we initially focus on the expert advisory group and their constructions of the project's 'use-value'. We then consider the background 'shadows' in and out of 'expert' space, as a trailing presence of research intentions and trajectories. Ideas of public sociology - as with an open 'city publics'-often assumes that all users are interested, willing to hear and appear as equal members of a 'community'. In contrast, the experience of engaging a user group may involve dis-engaging the research-researcher researched and here we provide disruptions to a straightforward 'travelling through' research space as we walk through our research methodologies. This article presents professional and personal reflections on research experience as well as interpretative accounts of navigating fieldwork and city space.

KW - public sociology

KW - use

KW - impact

KW - city publics

KW - class

KW - gender

UR - http://www.socresonline.org.uk/home.html

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-83455206676&partnerID=40&md5=43016572122dc0134cae27f23fe07b12

U2 - 10.5153/sro.2423

DO - 10.5153/sro.2423

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Sociological Research Online

JF - Sociological Research Online

SN - 1360-7804

IS - 4

ER -