Abstract
The concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) has quickly established itself as a major focus within regional development research. A key conceptual framing commonly adopted by scholars theorising about the growth and evolutionary dynamics of EEs is via anthropomorphised life-cycle models. In this debate article we offer a critique and argumentation as to why the validity of this approach is spurious and contestable. Arguably, life-cycle based models overly simplify these complex spatial entrepreneurial phenomena and convey the temporal evolution of EEs as a simplistic, linear, deterministic and path dependent process. Despite the seductively simplistic appeal of life-cycle models, places are not like people and the uncritical adoption of such crude anthropomorphic framings potentially weakens this research field, at the same time running the risk of mis-informing policy makers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 384-396 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Regional Studies |
| Volume | 57 |
| Early online date | 16 Nov 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- entrepreneurial ecosystems
- life-cycles
- path dependence
- public policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Places are not like people: the perils of anthropomorphism within entrepreneurial ecosystems research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver