Pitfalls in the quest for South Sea rationality

R. Dale; J. Johnson; L. Tang

doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x

Pitfalls in the quest for South Sea rationality

R. Dale
, J. Johnson
, L. Tang

Accounting And Finance

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Shea offers three main criticisms of our article. These relate to the legal status of subscription receipts, the relevance of post-crash trading data and the appropriate treatment of counterparty risk. In sections i-iii we refute Shea's arguments, and in section iv we suggest some further areas for research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	766-772
Number of pages	6
Journal	Economic History Review
Volume	60
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x
Publication status	Published - Nov 2007

Keywords

financial markets
history

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x

Cite this

@article{d5c16d5139574ec38e9bdbd1671677b1,

title = "Pitfalls in the quest for South Sea rationality",

abstract = "Shea offers three main criticisms of our article. These relate to the legal status of subscription receipts, the relevance of post-crash trading data and the appropriate treatment of counterparty risk. In sections i-iii we refute Shea's arguments, and in section iv we suggest some further areas for research.",

keywords = "financial markets, history",

author = "R. Dale and J. Johnson and L. Tang",

year = "2007",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "766--772",

journal = "Economic History Review",

issn = "0013-0117",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pitfalls in the quest for South Sea rationality

AU - Dale, R.

AU - Johnson, J.

AU - Tang, L.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Shea offers three main criticisms of our article. These relate to the legal status of subscription receipts, the relevance of post-crash trading data and the appropriate treatment of counterparty risk. In sections i-iii we refute Shea's arguments, and in section iv we suggest some further areas for research.

AB - Shea offers three main criticisms of our article. These relate to the legal status of subscription receipts, the relevance of post-crash trading data and the appropriate treatment of counterparty risk. In sections i-iii we refute Shea's arguments, and in section iv we suggest some further areas for research.

KW - financial markets

KW - history

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00378.x

M3 - Article

SN - 0013-0117

VL - 60

SP - 766

EP - 772

JO - Economic History Review

JF - Economic History Review

IS - 4

ER -

Pitfalls in the quest for South Sea rationality

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this