Pioneering process research: Andrew Pettigrew's contribution to management scholarship, 1962-2014

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper takes stock of Andrew Pettigrew's contribution to management scholarship. It goes through the process, content, and context of his research career. Chronologically, the Process will be subdivided into the three distinct phases of the period leading up to the establishment of the Centre for Strategic Management and Change, his time with the centre, and the research since leaving the Centre. The content of his research focused on big problems and emerging phenomena like decision-making, organizational culture, organization development, strategic change, human resource management, competitiveness, new public management, boards of directors, innovative forms of organizing, high performing research teams, and business schools. His contextualist methodology for process research will be explicated. Pettigrew's contribution will be put in context by comparing it with contemporary research. The paper concludes that there is still a need to go for big problems and emerging phenomena, and for providing a processual understanding of management reality. There is a need to develop process research methodologies like Pettigrew's contextualism further, especially with regard to process research methods.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages111-132
    Number of pages22
    JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
    Volume18
    Issue number2
    Early online date29 Mar 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

    Fingerprint

    Human resource management
    Process research
    Pioneering
    Strategic change
    Decision making
    Industry
    Board of directors
    Organizing
    Business schools
    Competitiveness
    Strategic management
    Contextualism
    Research methods
    Organizational culture
    Organization development
    Methodology
    New public management

    Keywords

    • Andrew Pettigrew
    • process research
    • management process
    • management scholarship

    Cite this

    @article{0fcce8a9fe8b4251a421bbf587b18d84,
    title = "Pioneering process research: Andrew Pettigrew's contribution to management scholarship, 1962-2014",
    abstract = "This paper takes stock of Andrew Pettigrew's contribution to management scholarship. It goes through the process, content, and context of his research career. Chronologically, the Process will be subdivided into the three distinct phases of the period leading up to the establishment of the Centre for Strategic Management and Change, his time with the centre, and the research since leaving the Centre. The content of his research focused on big problems and emerging phenomena like decision-making, organizational culture, organization development, strategic change, human resource management, competitiveness, new public management, boards of directors, innovative forms of organizing, high performing research teams, and business schools. His contextualist methodology for process research will be explicated. Pettigrew's contribution will be put in context by comparing it with contemporary research. The paper concludes that there is still a need to go for big problems and emerging phenomena, and for providing a processual understanding of management reality. There is a need to develop process research methodologies like Pettigrew's contextualism further, especially with regard to process research methods.",
    keywords = "Andrew Pettigrew, process research, management process, management scholarship",
    author = "Harry Sminia",
    note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sminia, Harry, 'Pioneering Process Research: Andrew Pettigrew's Contribution to Management Scholarship, 1962–2014', International Journal of Management Reviews (1468-2370), 2015, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12063. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
    year = "2016",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/ijmr.12063",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "111--132",
    journal = "International Journal of Management Reviews",
    issn = "1460-8545",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pioneering process research

    T2 - International Journal of Management Reviews

    AU - Sminia, Harry

    N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sminia, Harry, 'Pioneering Process Research: Andrew Pettigrew's Contribution to Management Scholarship, 1962–2014', International Journal of Management Reviews (1468-2370), 2015, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12063. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    PY - 2016/4/1

    Y1 - 2016/4/1

    N2 - This paper takes stock of Andrew Pettigrew's contribution to management scholarship. It goes through the process, content, and context of his research career. Chronologically, the Process will be subdivided into the three distinct phases of the period leading up to the establishment of the Centre for Strategic Management and Change, his time with the centre, and the research since leaving the Centre. The content of his research focused on big problems and emerging phenomena like decision-making, organizational culture, organization development, strategic change, human resource management, competitiveness, new public management, boards of directors, innovative forms of organizing, high performing research teams, and business schools. His contextualist methodology for process research will be explicated. Pettigrew's contribution will be put in context by comparing it with contemporary research. The paper concludes that there is still a need to go for big problems and emerging phenomena, and for providing a processual understanding of management reality. There is a need to develop process research methodologies like Pettigrew's contextualism further, especially with regard to process research methods.

    AB - This paper takes stock of Andrew Pettigrew's contribution to management scholarship. It goes through the process, content, and context of his research career. Chronologically, the Process will be subdivided into the three distinct phases of the period leading up to the establishment of the Centre for Strategic Management and Change, his time with the centre, and the research since leaving the Centre. The content of his research focused on big problems and emerging phenomena like decision-making, organizational culture, organization development, strategic change, human resource management, competitiveness, new public management, boards of directors, innovative forms of organizing, high performing research teams, and business schools. His contextualist methodology for process research will be explicated. Pettigrew's contribution will be put in context by comparing it with contemporary research. The paper concludes that there is still a need to go for big problems and emerging phenomena, and for providing a processual understanding of management reality. There is a need to develop process research methodologies like Pettigrew's contextualism further, especially with regard to process research methods.

    KW - Andrew Pettigrew

    KW - process research

    KW - management process

    KW - management scholarship

    UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2370

    U2 - 10.1111/ijmr.12063

    DO - 10.1111/ijmr.12063

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 111

    EP - 132

    JO - International Journal of Management Reviews

    JF - International Journal of Management Reviews

    SN - 1460-8545

    IS - 2

    ER -