Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government

Robert Mattes, Jennifer Christie

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the political consequences of quality of life, focusing on the link between perceived well-being and people’s support for democratic government. We make two key distinctions. First of all, with regard to quality of life, we distinguish between assessments of personal, or household, quality of life, and assessments of collective (national, community) quality of life. Secondly, we follow David Easton in distinguishing between specific support (attitudes about specific leaders, parties and policies) and diffuse support (attitudes toward the political system in general). We find that personal quality of life is only weakly and inconsistently connected to specific or diffuse support. Perceptions of collective quality of life, however, are strongly related to both specific and diffuse support. Thus, South Africans are holding their government accountable to their perceptions of national well-being. Of greater concern, however, is that they also appear to be holding the democratic system accountable to such developments. Teaching people to distinguish between their evaluations of a specific government and their evaluations of the larger system of democratic government appears to be a key challenge confronting the development of a democratic political culture in South Africa.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationQuality of Life in South Africa
EditorsValerie Moller
Place of PublicationDordecht
PublisherSpringer
Pages205-238
Number of pages34
Volume1
ISBN (Print)0792347978, 9789401071628
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Publication series

Name Social Indicators Research Series
PublisherSpringer
Volume1

Fingerprint

quality of life
evaluation
well-being
political culture
political system
leader
Teaching
community

Keywords

  • democracy
  • diffuse support
  • political culture
  • quality of life
  • South Africa

Cite this

Mattes, R., & Christie, J. (1997). Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government. In V. Moller (Ed.), Quality of Life in South Africa (Vol. 1, pp. 205-238). ( Social Indicators Research Series; Vol. 1). Dordecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1479-7_9
Mattes, Robert ; Christie, Jennifer. / Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government. Quality of Life in South Africa. editor / Valerie Moller. Vol. 1 Dordecht : Springer, 1997. pp. 205-238 ( Social Indicators Research Series).
@inbook{df8d50e7fa2b46379dd9d2be3be80095,
title = "Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government",
abstract = "In this paper, we examine the political consequences of quality of life, focusing on the link between perceived well-being and people’s support for democratic government. We make two key distinctions. First of all, with regard to quality of life, we distinguish between assessments of personal, or household, quality of life, and assessments of collective (national, community) quality of life. Secondly, we follow David Easton in distinguishing between specific support (attitudes about specific leaders, parties and policies) and diffuse support (attitudes toward the political system in general). We find that personal quality of life is only weakly and inconsistently connected to specific or diffuse support. Perceptions of collective quality of life, however, are strongly related to both specific and diffuse support. Thus, South Africans are holding their government accountable to their perceptions of national well-being. Of greater concern, however, is that they also appear to be holding the democratic system accountable to such developments. Teaching people to distinguish between their evaluations of a specific government and their evaluations of the larger system of democratic government appears to be a key challenge confronting the development of a democratic political culture in South Africa.",
keywords = "democracy, diffuse support, political culture, quality of life, South Africa",
author = "Robert Mattes and Jennifer Christie",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-009-1479-7_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "0792347978",
volume = "1",
series = "Social Indicators Research Series",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "205--238",
editor = "Valerie Moller",
booktitle = "Quality of Life in South Africa",

}

Mattes, R & Christie, J 1997, Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government. in V Moller (ed.), Quality of Life in South Africa. vol. 1, Social Indicators Research Series, vol. 1, Springer, Dordecht, pp. 205-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1479-7_9

Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government. / Mattes, Robert; Christie, Jennifer.

Quality of Life in South Africa. ed. / Valerie Moller. Vol. 1 Dordecht : Springer, 1997. p. 205-238 ( Social Indicators Research Series; Vol. 1).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government

AU - Mattes, Robert

AU - Christie, Jennifer

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - In this paper, we examine the political consequences of quality of life, focusing on the link between perceived well-being and people’s support for democratic government. We make two key distinctions. First of all, with regard to quality of life, we distinguish between assessments of personal, or household, quality of life, and assessments of collective (national, community) quality of life. Secondly, we follow David Easton in distinguishing between specific support (attitudes about specific leaders, parties and policies) and diffuse support (attitudes toward the political system in general). We find that personal quality of life is only weakly and inconsistently connected to specific or diffuse support. Perceptions of collective quality of life, however, are strongly related to both specific and diffuse support. Thus, South Africans are holding their government accountable to their perceptions of national well-being. Of greater concern, however, is that they also appear to be holding the democratic system accountable to such developments. Teaching people to distinguish between their evaluations of a specific government and their evaluations of the larger system of democratic government appears to be a key challenge confronting the development of a democratic political culture in South Africa.

AB - In this paper, we examine the political consequences of quality of life, focusing on the link between perceived well-being and people’s support for democratic government. We make two key distinctions. First of all, with regard to quality of life, we distinguish between assessments of personal, or household, quality of life, and assessments of collective (national, community) quality of life. Secondly, we follow David Easton in distinguishing between specific support (attitudes about specific leaders, parties and policies) and diffuse support (attitudes toward the political system in general). We find that personal quality of life is only weakly and inconsistently connected to specific or diffuse support. Perceptions of collective quality of life, however, are strongly related to both specific and diffuse support. Thus, South Africans are holding their government accountable to their perceptions of national well-being. Of greater concern, however, is that they also appear to be holding the democratic system accountable to such developments. Teaching people to distinguish between their evaluations of a specific government and their evaluations of the larger system of democratic government appears to be a key challenge confronting the development of a democratic political culture in South Africa.

KW - democracy

KW - diffuse support

KW - political culture

KW - quality of life

KW - South Africa

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-009-1479-7_9

DO - 10.1007/978-94-009-1479-7_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0792347978

SN - 9789401071628

VL - 1

T3 - Social Indicators Research Series

SP - 205

EP - 238

BT - Quality of Life in South Africa

A2 - Moller, Valerie

PB - Springer

CY - Dordecht

ER -

Mattes R, Christie J. Personal Vs. Collective Quality of Life and South Africans’ Evaluations of Democratic Government. In Moller V, editor, Quality of Life in South Africa. Vol. 1. Dordecht: Springer. 1997. p. 205-238. ( Social Indicators Research Series). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1479-7_9