Perseverant responding in children’s picture naming

Josephine N. Booth, Melanie Vitkovitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two groups of children were given pictures of animals to name as quickly as they could. The groups comprised 40 nursery aged children (mean age 3 ;11) and 40 Year 2 children (mean age 6;9) attending primary school in London. The 30 animals were presented one by one, on cards, and any errors made by the children were noted. Consistent with a similar object naming study with adults (Vitkovitch, Kirby & Tyrrell, 1996) and a study with children (Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002), picture naming errors referred to earlier named objects. However, while adults showed below-chance interference from objects that had only just been named (Lag 1), children were most susceptible to interference from very recently named objects (see also Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002). Furthermore, the proportion of younger children making Lag 1 errors was higher than the proportion of older children making Lag 1 errors. The results are discussed in relation to the activation levels of lexical representations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages235-246
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Child Language
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

interference
animal
Picture Naming
Nurseries
activation
Names
primary school
Group
Interference
Animals
Proportion
Activation
Primary School
Lexical Representation
Object Naming

Keywords

  • child behaviour
  • perseverant responding
  • picture description

Cite this

Booth, Josephine N. ; Vitkovitch, Melanie. / Perseverant responding in children’s picture naming. In: Journal of Child Language. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 235-246.
@article{987a962550ba447f909ddca57ec2250e,
title = "Perseverant responding in children’s picture naming",
abstract = "Two groups of children were given pictures of animals to name as quickly as they could. The groups comprised 40 nursery aged children (mean age 3 ;11) and 40 Year 2 children (mean age 6;9) attending primary school in London. The 30 animals were presented one by one, on cards, and any errors made by the children were noted. Consistent with a similar object naming study with adults (Vitkovitch, Kirby & Tyrrell, 1996) and a study with children (Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002), picture naming errors referred to earlier named objects. However, while adults showed below-chance interference from objects that had only just been named (Lag 1), children were most susceptible to interference from very recently named objects (see also Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002). Furthermore, the proportion of younger children making Lag 1 errors was higher than the proportion of older children making Lag 1 errors. The results are discussed in relation to the activation levels of lexical representations.",
keywords = "child behaviour, perseverant responding, picture description",
author = "Booth, {Josephine N.} and Melanie Vitkovitch",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1017/S030500090700832X",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "235--246",
journal = "Journal of Child Language",
issn = "0305-0009",
number = "1",

}

Perseverant responding in children’s picture naming. / Booth, Josephine N.; Vitkovitch, Melanie.

In: Journal of Child Language, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2008, p. 235-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perseverant responding in children’s picture naming

AU - Booth, Josephine N.

AU - Vitkovitch, Melanie

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Two groups of children were given pictures of animals to name as quickly as they could. The groups comprised 40 nursery aged children (mean age 3 ;11) and 40 Year 2 children (mean age 6;9) attending primary school in London. The 30 animals were presented one by one, on cards, and any errors made by the children were noted. Consistent with a similar object naming study with adults (Vitkovitch, Kirby & Tyrrell, 1996) and a study with children (Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002), picture naming errors referred to earlier named objects. However, while adults showed below-chance interference from objects that had only just been named (Lag 1), children were most susceptible to interference from very recently named objects (see also Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002). Furthermore, the proportion of younger children making Lag 1 errors was higher than the proportion of older children making Lag 1 errors. The results are discussed in relation to the activation levels of lexical representations.

AB - Two groups of children were given pictures of animals to name as quickly as they could. The groups comprised 40 nursery aged children (mean age 3 ;11) and 40 Year 2 children (mean age 6;9) attending primary school in London. The 30 animals were presented one by one, on cards, and any errors made by the children were noted. Consistent with a similar object naming study with adults (Vitkovitch, Kirby & Tyrrell, 1996) and a study with children (Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002), picture naming errors referred to earlier named objects. However, while adults showed below-chance interference from objects that had only just been named (Lag 1), children were most susceptible to interference from very recently named objects (see also Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002). Furthermore, the proportion of younger children making Lag 1 errors was higher than the proportion of older children making Lag 1 errors. The results are discussed in relation to the activation levels of lexical representations.

KW - child behaviour

KW - perseverant responding

KW - picture description

U2 - 10.1017/S030500090700832X

DO - 10.1017/S030500090700832X

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 235

EP - 246

JO - Journal of Child Language

T2 - Journal of Child Language

JF - Journal of Child Language

SN - 0305-0009

IS - 1

ER -