Performing modularity: competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization

Luciana D'Adderio, Neil Pollock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

76 Citations (Scopus)
174 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We address the effect of organizational theories on the organization by focusing on how modularity, a widespread and influential organizational theory, performs a modular organization. While scholars have offered opposing arguments for the influence of this theory—i.e. that it either succeeds or fails to “produce” modular organizations—we show just how and how far modularity is enacted and shapes the organization, and how it may be shaped in turn. Drawing on recent advances in performativity theory we thus contribute to modularity by showing how the modular organization emerges over time as the outcome of performative struggles among competing and complementary theories and how these struggles contribute to modifying the theory and “designing” organizations. We also add to performativity by theorizing the competition between multiple theories, the emergence of unexpected consequences or “errors”, and their implications for organizational practices and boundaries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1813-1843
Number of pages31
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume35
Issue number12
Early online date19 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Keywords

  • innovation
  • organizational theory
  • organization studies
  • routines theory
  • performativity
  • modularity
  • strategy
  • materiality
  • artefacts
  • artifacts
  • technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performing modularity: competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this