Perceptions and experience of employment regulation in UK small firms

S.L. Carter, C.M. Mason, S.K. Tagg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The view that excessive regulation constrains small business growth has been a persistent theme within business and policy communities, although recent studies have demonstrated the actual effects of regulation to be relatively modest. A prior small-scale study proposed four reasons why employment legislation does 'not damage' small firms. We attempt to assess the robustness of these propositions in a large-scale survey of 16 779 small firms. Results provide empirical support for three propositions. Firstly, perceived dissatisfaction masks actual effects. Secondly, competitive conditions mediate regulatory effects; however, even resource-constrained firms reported few negative effects. Thirdly, informality eases regulatory impact. Results failed to confirm that older laws are 'routinised'. Length of time as a business owner was found to be more influential than age of regulation, with owners who have been in business for many years having a longer 'window of exposure' increasing their likelihood of experiencing negative and positive effects.
LanguageEnglish
Pages263-278
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume27
Issue number2
Early online date27 Jan 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

firm
regulation
experience
small business
legislation
damages
effect
damage
Law
resource
resources
community

Keywords

  • employment regulation
  • UK small firms

Cite this

Carter, S.L. ; Mason, C.M. ; Tagg, S.K. / Perceptions and experience of employment regulation in UK small firms. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 263-278.
@article{4b68a1e06e604b11a5fa1c3011f29ed3,
title = "Perceptions and experience of employment regulation in UK small firms",
abstract = "The view that excessive regulation constrains small business growth has been a persistent theme within business and policy communities, although recent studies have demonstrated the actual effects of regulation to be relatively modest. A prior small-scale study proposed four reasons why employment legislation does 'not damage' small firms. We attempt to assess the robustness of these propositions in a large-scale survey of 16 779 small firms. Results provide empirical support for three propositions. Firstly, perceived dissatisfaction masks actual effects. Secondly, competitive conditions mediate regulatory effects; however, even resource-constrained firms reported few negative effects. Thirdly, informality eases regulatory impact. Results failed to confirm that older laws are 'routinised'. Length of time as a business owner was found to be more influential than age of regulation, with owners who have been in business for many years having a longer 'window of exposure' increasing their likelihood of experiencing negative and positive effects.",
keywords = "employment regulation, UK small firms",
author = "S.L. Carter and C.M. Mason and S.K. Tagg",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1068/c07106b",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "263--278",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
issn = "1472-3425",
number = "2",

}

Perceptions and experience of employment regulation in UK small firms. / Carter, S.L.; Mason, C.M.; Tagg, S.K.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 27, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 263-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions and experience of employment regulation in UK small firms

AU - Carter, S.L.

AU - Mason, C.M.

AU - Tagg, S.K.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - The view that excessive regulation constrains small business growth has been a persistent theme within business and policy communities, although recent studies have demonstrated the actual effects of regulation to be relatively modest. A prior small-scale study proposed four reasons why employment legislation does 'not damage' small firms. We attempt to assess the robustness of these propositions in a large-scale survey of 16 779 small firms. Results provide empirical support for three propositions. Firstly, perceived dissatisfaction masks actual effects. Secondly, competitive conditions mediate regulatory effects; however, even resource-constrained firms reported few negative effects. Thirdly, informality eases regulatory impact. Results failed to confirm that older laws are 'routinised'. Length of time as a business owner was found to be more influential than age of regulation, with owners who have been in business for many years having a longer 'window of exposure' increasing their likelihood of experiencing negative and positive effects.

AB - The view that excessive regulation constrains small business growth has been a persistent theme within business and policy communities, although recent studies have demonstrated the actual effects of regulation to be relatively modest. A prior small-scale study proposed four reasons why employment legislation does 'not damage' small firms. We attempt to assess the robustness of these propositions in a large-scale survey of 16 779 small firms. Results provide empirical support for three propositions. Firstly, perceived dissatisfaction masks actual effects. Secondly, competitive conditions mediate regulatory effects; however, even resource-constrained firms reported few negative effects. Thirdly, informality eases regulatory impact. Results failed to confirm that older laws are 'routinised'. Length of time as a business owner was found to be more influential than age of regulation, with owners who have been in business for many years having a longer 'window of exposure' increasing their likelihood of experiencing negative and positive effects.

KW - employment regulation

KW - UK small firms

U2 - 10.1068/c07106b

DO - 10.1068/c07106b

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 263

EP - 278

JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

T2 - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

SN - 1472-3425

IS - 2

ER -