Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students

Christine Howe, A. Anderson, R. Soden, J. Halliday, J. Low

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A teaching programme is reported in which critical thinking skills (in the sense of reasoned justification of arguments; see Kuhn, 1991, 1993) were taught. The principal aims of the study were to develop, implement and evaluate a programme for teaching evidence-based justification to vocational education students in Further Education colleges. Teaching was via modelling and peer-based critiquing exercises in the context of the students'' project work. Eighty-four Further Education college students underwent a 10-session teaching intervention which dovetailed with their Additional Assessment integrative project work. Students took part in peer-based exercises in which they learned to critique imaginary examples of project outlines and plans, followed by similar peer-based critiquing of each others' proposed projects. Analysis of the students' dialogues with each other indicated that they had learned the importance of justifying arguments, and content analysis of their written work indicated that they engaged in justification of their arguments to a significantly greater degree than control groups. Several key variables in the dialogues correlated positively with justification in the written work, suggesting that the dialogue had impacted on the written work. However, justification tended to be of a weak kind (using anecdotes or experience-based generalisations), and strong (i.e. formal research-based) evidence remained relatively infrequent and sometimes inappropriately used. A psychometric test of general critical thinking skills showed no evidence of transfer of learning.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-32
Number of pages31
JournalInstructional Science
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint

further education
Learning
Students
Teaching
Education
interaction
learning
dialogue
student
Vocational Education
Anecdotes
Exercise
evidence
teaching program
Psychometrics
psychometrics
content analysis
Thinking
Control Groups
Research

Keywords

  • further education
  • critical thinking
  • justifiction

Cite this

Howe, Christine ; Anderson, A. ; Soden, R. ; Halliday, J. ; Low, J. / Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. In: Instructional Science. 2001 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 1-32.
@article{ffde0ab7005f4f179cfe1488c442e023,
title = "Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students",
abstract = "A teaching programme is reported in which critical thinking skills (in the sense of reasoned justification of arguments; see Kuhn, 1991, 1993) were taught. The principal aims of the study were to develop, implement and evaluate a programme for teaching evidence-based justification to vocational education students in Further Education colleges. Teaching was via modelling and peer-based critiquing exercises in the context of the students'' project work. Eighty-four Further Education college students underwent a 10-session teaching intervention which dovetailed with their Additional Assessment integrative project work. Students took part in peer-based exercises in which they learned to critique imaginary examples of project outlines and plans, followed by similar peer-based critiquing of each others' proposed projects. Analysis of the students' dialogues with each other indicated that they had learned the importance of justifying arguments, and content analysis of their written work indicated that they engaged in justification of their arguments to a significantly greater degree than control groups. Several key variables in the dialogues correlated positively with justification in the written work, suggesting that the dialogue had impacted on the written work. However, justification tended to be of a weak kind (using anecdotes or experience-based generalisations), and strong (i.e. formal research-based) evidence remained relatively infrequent and sometimes inappropriately used. A psychometric test of general critical thinking skills showed no evidence of transfer of learning.",
keywords = "further education, critical thinking, justifiction",
author = "Christine Howe and A. Anderson and R. Soden and J. Halliday and J. Low",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1026471702353",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1--32",
journal = "Instructional Science",
issn = "0020-4277",
number = "1",

}

Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. / Howe, Christine; Anderson, A.; Soden, R.; Halliday, J.; Low, J.

In: Instructional Science, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 1-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students

AU - Howe, Christine

AU - Anderson, A.

AU - Soden, R.

AU - Halliday, J.

AU - Low, J.

PY - 2001/1

Y1 - 2001/1

N2 - A teaching programme is reported in which critical thinking skills (in the sense of reasoned justification of arguments; see Kuhn, 1991, 1993) were taught. The principal aims of the study were to develop, implement and evaluate a programme for teaching evidence-based justification to vocational education students in Further Education colleges. Teaching was via modelling and peer-based critiquing exercises in the context of the students'' project work. Eighty-four Further Education college students underwent a 10-session teaching intervention which dovetailed with their Additional Assessment integrative project work. Students took part in peer-based exercises in which they learned to critique imaginary examples of project outlines and plans, followed by similar peer-based critiquing of each others' proposed projects. Analysis of the students' dialogues with each other indicated that they had learned the importance of justifying arguments, and content analysis of their written work indicated that they engaged in justification of their arguments to a significantly greater degree than control groups. Several key variables in the dialogues correlated positively with justification in the written work, suggesting that the dialogue had impacted on the written work. However, justification tended to be of a weak kind (using anecdotes or experience-based generalisations), and strong (i.e. formal research-based) evidence remained relatively infrequent and sometimes inappropriately used. A psychometric test of general critical thinking skills showed no evidence of transfer of learning.

AB - A teaching programme is reported in which critical thinking skills (in the sense of reasoned justification of arguments; see Kuhn, 1991, 1993) were taught. The principal aims of the study were to develop, implement and evaluate a programme for teaching evidence-based justification to vocational education students in Further Education colleges. Teaching was via modelling and peer-based critiquing exercises in the context of the students'' project work. Eighty-four Further Education college students underwent a 10-session teaching intervention which dovetailed with their Additional Assessment integrative project work. Students took part in peer-based exercises in which they learned to critique imaginary examples of project outlines and plans, followed by similar peer-based critiquing of each others' proposed projects. Analysis of the students' dialogues with each other indicated that they had learned the importance of justifying arguments, and content analysis of their written work indicated that they engaged in justification of their arguments to a significantly greater degree than control groups. Several key variables in the dialogues correlated positively with justification in the written work, suggesting that the dialogue had impacted on the written work. However, justification tended to be of a weak kind (using anecdotes or experience-based generalisations), and strong (i.e. formal research-based) evidence remained relatively infrequent and sometimes inappropriately used. A psychometric test of general critical thinking skills showed no evidence of transfer of learning.

KW - further education

KW - critical thinking

KW - justifiction

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026471702353

U2 - 10.1023/A:1026471702353

DO - 10.1023/A:1026471702353

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1

EP - 32

JO - Instructional Science

T2 - Instructional Science

JF - Instructional Science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 1

ER -