Peak ground accelerations from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes: a comparison with predictions from eight recent ground-motion models

John Douglas, David M. Boore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Strong-motion data from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes invariably make up a small proportion of the records used to develop empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Consequently GMPEs are more poorly constrained for large earthquakes than for small events. In this article peak ground accelerations (PGAs) observed in 38 earthquakes worldwide with M≥7.2 are compared with those predicted by eight recent GMPEs. Well over half of the 38 earthquakes were not considered when deriving these GMPEs but the data were identified by a thorough literature review of strong-motion reports from the past sixty years. These data are provided in an electronic supplement for future investigations on ground motions from large earthquakes. The addition of these data provides better constraint of the between-event ground-motion variability in large earthquakes. It is found that the eight models generally provide good predictions for PGAs from these earthquakes, although there is evidence for slight under- or over-prediction of motions by some models (particularly for M>7.5). The between-event variabilities predicted by most models match the observed variability, if data from two events (2001 Bhuj and 2005 Crescent City) that are likely atypical of earthquakes in active regions are excluded. For some GMPEs there is evidence that they are over-predicting PGAs in the near-source region of large earthquakes as well as over-predicting motions on hard rock. Overall, however, all the considered models, despite having been derived using limited data, provide reliable predictions of PGAs in the largest crustal earthquakes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-21
Number of pages21
JournalBulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date26 Jul 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

ground motion
Earthquakes
earthquakes
earthquake
prediction
predictions
strong motion
comparison
hard rock
literature review
supplements
proportion
Rocks
rocks

Keywords

  • large earthquakes
  • ground-motion prediction
  • peak ground acceleration
  • strong-motion data
  • residual analysis
  • between-event variability

Cite this

@article{46f51d3578fd4922b6d9d9b68f5f8960,
title = "Peak ground accelerations from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes: a comparison with predictions from eight recent ground-motion models",
abstract = "Strong-motion data from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes invariably make up a small proportion of the records used to develop empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Consequently GMPEs are more poorly constrained for large earthquakes than for small events. In this article peak ground accelerations (PGAs) observed in 38 earthquakes worldwide with M≥7.2 are compared with those predicted by eight recent GMPEs. Well over half of the 38 earthquakes were not considered when deriving these GMPEs but the data were identified by a thorough literature review of strong-motion reports from the past sixty years. These data are provided in an electronic supplement for future investigations on ground motions from large earthquakes. The addition of these data provides better constraint of the between-event ground-motion variability in large earthquakes. It is found that the eight models generally provide good predictions for PGAs from these earthquakes, although there is evidence for slight under- or over-prediction of motions by some models (particularly for M>7.5). The between-event variabilities predicted by most models match the observed variability, if data from two events (2001 Bhuj and 2005 Crescent City) that are likely atypical of earthquakes in active regions are excluded. For some GMPEs there is evidence that they are over-predicting PGAs in the near-source region of large earthquakes as well as over-predicting motions on hard rock. Overall, however, all the considered models, despite having been derived using limited data, provide reliable predictions of PGAs in the largest crustal earthquakes.",
keywords = "large earthquakes, ground-motion prediction, peak ground acceleration, strong-motion data, residual analysis, between-event variability",
author = "John Douglas and Boore, {David M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s10518-017-0194-7",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering",
issn = "1570-761X",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peak ground accelerations from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes

T2 - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

AU - Douglas,John

AU - Boore,David M.

PY - 2018/1/31

Y1 - 2018/1/31

N2 - Strong-motion data from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes invariably make up a small proportion of the records used to develop empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Consequently GMPEs are more poorly constrained for large earthquakes than for small events. In this article peak ground accelerations (PGAs) observed in 38 earthquakes worldwide with M≥7.2 are compared with those predicted by eight recent GMPEs. Well over half of the 38 earthquakes were not considered when deriving these GMPEs but the data were identified by a thorough literature review of strong-motion reports from the past sixty years. These data are provided in an electronic supplement for future investigations on ground motions from large earthquakes. The addition of these data provides better constraint of the between-event ground-motion variability in large earthquakes. It is found that the eight models generally provide good predictions for PGAs from these earthquakes, although there is evidence for slight under- or over-prediction of motions by some models (particularly for M>7.5). The between-event variabilities predicted by most models match the observed variability, if data from two events (2001 Bhuj and 2005 Crescent City) that are likely atypical of earthquakes in active regions are excluded. For some GMPEs there is evidence that they are over-predicting PGAs in the near-source region of large earthquakes as well as over-predicting motions on hard rock. Overall, however, all the considered models, despite having been derived using limited data, provide reliable predictions of PGAs in the largest crustal earthquakes.

AB - Strong-motion data from large (M≥7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes invariably make up a small proportion of the records used to develop empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Consequently GMPEs are more poorly constrained for large earthquakes than for small events. In this article peak ground accelerations (PGAs) observed in 38 earthquakes worldwide with M≥7.2 are compared with those predicted by eight recent GMPEs. Well over half of the 38 earthquakes were not considered when deriving these GMPEs but the data were identified by a thorough literature review of strong-motion reports from the past sixty years. These data are provided in an electronic supplement for future investigations on ground motions from large earthquakes. The addition of these data provides better constraint of the between-event ground-motion variability in large earthquakes. It is found that the eight models generally provide good predictions for PGAs from these earthquakes, although there is evidence for slight under- or over-prediction of motions by some models (particularly for M>7.5). The between-event variabilities predicted by most models match the observed variability, if data from two events (2001 Bhuj and 2005 Crescent City) that are likely atypical of earthquakes in active regions are excluded. For some GMPEs there is evidence that they are over-predicting PGAs in the near-source region of large earthquakes as well as over-predicting motions on hard rock. Overall, however, all the considered models, despite having been derived using limited data, provide reliable predictions of PGAs in the largest crustal earthquakes.

KW - large earthquakes

KW - ground-motion prediction

KW - peak ground acceleration

KW - strong-motion data

KW - residual analysis

KW - between-event variability

UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/10518

U2 - 10.1007/s10518-017-0194-7

DO - 10.1007/s10518-017-0194-7

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

JF - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

SN - 1570-761X

IS - 1

ER -