Peace through integration or peace through separation?: the effects of religious heterogeneity on communal tension in India’s federal states

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For decades, scholars and politicians have been engaging in the quest for an institutional model that prevents conflict and maintains peace in ethnically divided societies. Many propose a federal system, yet with different intentions: Segregationists argue that giving territorial autonomy to the different groups by creating homogeneous federal units will mediate political conflict and prevent secession by reducing discrimination of minorities. Integrationists reject this idea, claiming that integration in form of heterogeneous federal units promotes tolerance and thereby peace. This study sheds light on the debate by comparing India’s federal states, which differ in their levels of religious heterogeneity. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that religiously homogeneous federal units have higher levels of interreligious tolerance than heterogeneous units, lending support to the segregation thesis. However, the occurrence of communal riots in the different states does not seem to be affected by their degree of heterogeneity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages96-117
Number of pages21
JournalWorld Values Research
Volume4
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

federal state
tolerance
peace
India
secession
political conflict
lending
segregation
politician
discrimination
autonomy
minority
society
Group

Keywords

  • peace studies
  • India
  • religion and politics
  • segregation

Cite this

@article{beb17975ab2a4089ba304c9cf04e76aa,
title = "Peace through integration or peace through separation?: the effects of religious heterogeneity on communal tension in India’s federal states",
abstract = "For decades, scholars and politicians have been engaging in the quest for an institutional model that prevents conflict and maintains peace in ethnically divided societies. Many propose a federal system, yet with different intentions: Segregationists argue that giving territorial autonomy to the different groups by creating homogeneous federal units will mediate political conflict and prevent secession by reducing discrimination of minorities. Integrationists reject this idea, claiming that integration in form of heterogeneous federal units promotes tolerance and thereby peace. This study sheds light on the debate by comparing India’s federal states, which differ in their levels of religious heterogeneity. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that religiously homogeneous federal units have higher levels of interreligious tolerance than heterogeneous units, lending support to the segregation thesis. However, the occurrence of communal riots in the different states does not seem to be affected by their degree of heterogeneity.",
keywords = "peace studies, India, religion and politics, segregation",
author = "Stefanie Reher",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "96--117",
journal = "World Values Research",
issn = "2000-2777",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peace through integration or peace through separation?

T2 - World Values Research

AU - Reher, Stefanie

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - For decades, scholars and politicians have been engaging in the quest for an institutional model that prevents conflict and maintains peace in ethnically divided societies. Many propose a federal system, yet with different intentions: Segregationists argue that giving territorial autonomy to the different groups by creating homogeneous federal units will mediate political conflict and prevent secession by reducing discrimination of minorities. Integrationists reject this idea, claiming that integration in form of heterogeneous federal units promotes tolerance and thereby peace. This study sheds light on the debate by comparing India’s federal states, which differ in their levels of religious heterogeneity. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that religiously homogeneous federal units have higher levels of interreligious tolerance than heterogeneous units, lending support to the segregation thesis. However, the occurrence of communal riots in the different states does not seem to be affected by their degree of heterogeneity.

AB - For decades, scholars and politicians have been engaging in the quest for an institutional model that prevents conflict and maintains peace in ethnically divided societies. Many propose a federal system, yet with different intentions: Segregationists argue that giving territorial autonomy to the different groups by creating homogeneous federal units will mediate political conflict and prevent secession by reducing discrimination of minorities. Integrationists reject this idea, claiming that integration in form of heterogeneous federal units promotes tolerance and thereby peace. This study sheds light on the debate by comparing India’s federal states, which differ in their levels of religious heterogeneity. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that religiously homogeneous federal units have higher levels of interreligious tolerance than heterogeneous units, lending support to the segregation thesis. However, the occurrence of communal riots in the different states does not seem to be affected by their degree of heterogeneity.

KW - peace studies

KW - India

KW - religion and politics

KW - segregation

UR - http://research.ku.dk/search/?pure=en/publications/peace-through-integration-or-peace-through-separation(f80fbee9-ac78-4d4f-a32d-6f176f62a215).html

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 96

EP - 117

JO - World Values Research

JF - World Values Research

SN - 2000-2777

IS - 4

ER -