Patterns of malingering and compliance in measures of interrogative suggestibility

Stella Bain, James S. Baxter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to compare indicators of malingering with those of compliance on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1). It was hypothesised that participants issued with instructions either to appear susceptible to leading questions or to comply with an interviewer's perceived requirements would show unique patterns of GSS scores, allowing them to be differentiated from each other, and from a control group. The study had a single-factor between participants design. Participants were tested in one of three conditions: Misled, Compliant, or Standard instructions. Sixty-six participants took part in the study. Results indicated unique patterns of scoring in all three conditions; all three groups were distinguishable from each other. Results support previous studies which indicate that some patterns of malingering may be identifiable on the GSS. However, compliant responding may not be readily distinguishable from genuine vulnerability. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical distinction between suggestibility and compliance.
LanguageEnglish
Pages453-461
Number of pages8
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Malingering
Compliance
Interviews
Control Groups

Keywords

  • interrogative suggestibility
  • compliance
  • malingering
  • leading questions
  • interrogative pressure
  • interview

Cite this

@article{d10af963a83a43118ba65c715db4c800,
title = "Patterns of malingering and compliance in measures of interrogative suggestibility",
abstract = "This study aimed to compare indicators of malingering with those of compliance on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1). It was hypothesised that participants issued with instructions either to appear susceptible to leading questions or to comply with an interviewer's perceived requirements would show unique patterns of GSS scores, allowing them to be differentiated from each other, and from a control group. The study had a single-factor between participants design. Participants were tested in one of three conditions: Misled, Compliant, or Standard instructions. Sixty-six participants took part in the study. Results indicated unique patterns of scoring in all three conditions; all three groups were distinguishable from each other. Results support previous studies which indicate that some patterns of malingering may be identifiable on the GSS. However, compliant responding may not be readily distinguishable from genuine vulnerability. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical distinction between suggestibility and compliance.",
keywords = "interrogative suggestibility, compliance, malingering, leading questions, interrogative pressure, interview",
author = "Stella Bain and Baxter, {James S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "453--461",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
number = "3",

}

Patterns of malingering and compliance in measures of interrogative suggestibility. / Bain, Stella; Baxter, James S.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 30, No. 3, 02.2006, p. 453-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of malingering and compliance in measures of interrogative suggestibility

AU - Bain, Stella

AU - Baxter, James S.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - This study aimed to compare indicators of malingering with those of compliance on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1). It was hypothesised that participants issued with instructions either to appear susceptible to leading questions or to comply with an interviewer's perceived requirements would show unique patterns of GSS scores, allowing them to be differentiated from each other, and from a control group. The study had a single-factor between participants design. Participants were tested in one of three conditions: Misled, Compliant, or Standard instructions. Sixty-six participants took part in the study. Results indicated unique patterns of scoring in all three conditions; all three groups were distinguishable from each other. Results support previous studies which indicate that some patterns of malingering may be identifiable on the GSS. However, compliant responding may not be readily distinguishable from genuine vulnerability. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical distinction between suggestibility and compliance.

AB - This study aimed to compare indicators of malingering with those of compliance on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1). It was hypothesised that participants issued with instructions either to appear susceptible to leading questions or to comply with an interviewer's perceived requirements would show unique patterns of GSS scores, allowing them to be differentiated from each other, and from a control group. The study had a single-factor between participants design. Participants were tested in one of three conditions: Misled, Compliant, or Standard instructions. Sixty-six participants took part in the study. Results indicated unique patterns of scoring in all three conditions; all three groups were distinguishable from each other. Results support previous studies which indicate that some patterns of malingering may be identifiable on the GSS. However, compliant responding may not be readily distinguishable from genuine vulnerability. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical distinction between suggestibility and compliance.

KW - interrogative suggestibility

KW - compliance

KW - malingering

KW - leading questions

KW - interrogative pressure

KW - interview

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.010

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 453

EP - 461

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

T2 - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 3

ER -