Patterns of death penalty abolition, 1960-2005: domestic and international factors

Anthony McGann, Wayne Sandholtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)


On the eve of World War II, eight countries had completely abolished the death penalty and another six had banned it for ordinary crimes. As of early 2008, 92 countries had prohibited capital punishment for all crimes and 10 more had ruled it out for ordinary crimes. The goal of this article is to account for the pattern of national abolition of the death penalty since 1960. We hypothesize that certain kinds of democracies are more liable to end capital punishment than others. Specifically, the negotiated form of democracy produced by parliamentary systems with proportional representation (consensus democracy in Lijpharts terms) is more likely to do away with the death penalty than are other forms of democracy. As previous research indicates, democratic transitions also increase the likelihood of abolition. Finally, international influences can also tip countries toward abolition. We suggest that incentives provided by international organizations, particularly in Europe, have drawn some countries toward abolition. The empirical analysis of approximately 150 countries for the period 19602005 confirms our expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-289
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012


  • state
  • death penalty
  • human-rights
  • capital punishment


Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of death penalty abolition, 1960-2005: domestic and international factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this