Abstract
On the eve of World War II, eight countries had completely abolished the death penalty and another six had banned it for ordinary crimes. As of early 2008, 92 countries had prohibited capital punishment for all crimes and 10 more had ruled it out for ordinary crimes. The goal of this article is to account for the pattern of national abolition of the death penalty since 1960. We hypothesize that certain kinds of democracies are more liable to end capital punishment than others. Specifically, the negotiated form of democracy produced by parliamentary systems with proportional representation (consensus democracy in Lijpharts terms) is more likely to do away with the death penalty than are other forms of democracy. As previous research indicates, democratic transitions also increase the likelihood of abolition. Finally, international influences can also tip countries toward abolition. We suggest that incentives provided by international organizations, particularly in Europe, have drawn some countries toward abolition. The empirical analysis of approximately 150 countries for the period 19602005 confirms our expectations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 275-289 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | International Studies Quarterly |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- state
- death penalty
- human-rights
- capital punishment