Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the acceptability of completing digital quality of life questionnaires during routine haemodialysis clinics: a mixed-methods study

Ramsay Meiklem, Karen Stevenson, Sabine Richarz, David Kingsmore, Matt-Mouley Bouamrane, Mark Dunlop, Peter Thomson

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Advanced chronic kidney disease is a serious and common medical condition with significant treatment choices incurring varying levels of high treatment burden. Better understanding on how to best collect quality of life (QoL) in this unique situation may help guide critical decisions. This study investigates the acceptability of digital QoL questionnaires completed during routine haemodialysis sessions. Qualitative data was collected from patient (n=23) and clinical researcher (n=2) interviews alongside analysis of data from questionnaires completed by patients (n=101) during a 6-week validation study. Interviews refined the content and format of digital QoL questionnaires and pro-vided novel insights regarding how patients assessed and completed QoL questions. This study suggests collecting QoL data using digital tablet technology during routine haemodialysis clinics is both feasible and acceptable to patients and has provided novel insights that are not routinely available with traditional methods.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 2021
EventMedical Informatics 2021: One World, One Health: Global Partnership for Digital Innovation - Virtual conference
Duration: 2 Oct 20214 Oct 2021
https://imia-medinfo.org/medinfo21/

Conference

ConferenceMedical Informatics 2021
Abbreviated titleMedInfo '21
Period2/10/214/10/21
Internet address

Keywords

  • advanced chronic kidney disease
  • digital questionnaires
  • quality of life measures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the acceptability of completing digital quality of life questionnaires during routine haemodialysis clinics: a mixed-methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this