TY - JOUR
T1 - Partnership approaches to the evaluation of complex policy initiatives
T2 - qualitative research as key to building effective relationships
AU - Turner-Halliday, Fiona
AU - Welch, Vicki
AU - Bryce, Graham
AU - Forde, Matt
AU - Cotmore, Richard
AU - Wilson, Phil
AU - Fitzpatrick, Bridie
AU - Watson, Nicholas
AU - Minnis, Helen
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Turner-Halliday, F, Welch, V, Bryce, G, Forde, M, Cotmore, R, Wilson, P, Fitzpatrick, B, Watson, N & Minnis, H 2018, 'Partnership approaches to the evaluation of complex policy initiatives: qualitative research as key to building effective relationships' International Journal of Social Welfare, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12326. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
PY - 2018/7/19
Y1 - 2018/7/19
N2 - We argue that major health and social care policy initiatives are not too complex for randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology and illustrate this using the example of the Best Services Trial (BeST?): a RCT of an infant mental health intervention for maltreated children. We suggest that qualitative research, as a core part of the trial process from conception and development through to implementation and evaluation, is crucial in building, understanding and strengthening the partnership required to drive such a complex trial. Data pertinent to trial implementation demonstrate the iterative nature of the process whereby stakeholders are consulted and their views influence the conduct of the trial. Here we reflect on the bi-directional relationship between qualitative data collection and partnership-working in a trial. For very complex trials to be possible, significant resource needs to be available for the qualitative component. Key Practitioner Message: • Qualitative research is key to understanding, building and strengthening partnership approaches to researching complex interventions; • Qualitative research is vital to supporting randomised controlled trials involving multiple sectors; • Qualitative research provides essential explanatory power to outcome data in research.
AB - We argue that major health and social care policy initiatives are not too complex for randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology and illustrate this using the example of the Best Services Trial (BeST?): a RCT of an infant mental health intervention for maltreated children. We suggest that qualitative research, as a core part of the trial process from conception and development through to implementation and evaluation, is crucial in building, understanding and strengthening the partnership required to drive such a complex trial. Data pertinent to trial implementation demonstrate the iterative nature of the process whereby stakeholders are consulted and their views influence the conduct of the trial. Here we reflect on the bi-directional relationship between qualitative data collection and partnership-working in a trial. For very complex trials to be possible, significant resource needs to be available for the qualitative component. Key Practitioner Message: • Qualitative research is key to understanding, building and strengthening partnership approaches to researching complex interventions; • Qualitative research is vital to supporting randomised controlled trials involving multiple sectors; • Qualitative research provides essential explanatory power to outcome data in research.
KW - complex interventions
KW - maltreated children
KW - partnership
KW - qualitative research
KW - randomised controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050589594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682397
U2 - 10.1111/ijsw.12326
DO - 10.1111/ijsw.12326
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050589594
SN - 1369-6866
JO - International Journal of Social Welfare
JF - International Journal of Social Welfare
ER -