Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland

Angela O’Hagan, Claire MacRae, Clementine Hill O'Connor, Paul Teedon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The institutional engagement and analysis needed to effectively integrate the requirements of equality legislation into participatory budgeting (PB) processes requires a transformational approach. Equality processes appear to exist in parallel with PB activity, rather than being operationalized as integral to the objectives and character of PB activity at local level. This paper proposes that PB and the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in the Equality Act 2010 share a transformative intent and potential, but that this is undermined by siloed thinking on equalities and enduring discriminatory behaviour and practices. The paper concludes with propositions for aligning the conceptual links between equality and community empowerment and, thereby, participation in local financial decision-making in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalPublic Money and Management
Early online date28 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

public service
equality
community
Community engagement
Equality
Scotland
Participatory budgeting
Public services
empowerment
public sector
legislation
act
decision making
participation

Keywords

  • community
  • equality
  • gender
  • outcomes
  • participation

Cite this

@article{be74ddd4bb1149e9acd277d635f3a7be,
title = "Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland",
abstract = "The institutional engagement and analysis needed to effectively integrate the requirements of equality legislation into participatory budgeting (PB) processes requires a transformational approach. Equality processes appear to exist in parallel with PB activity, rather than being operationalized as integral to the objectives and character of PB activity at local level. This paper proposes that PB and the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in the Equality Act 2010 share a transformative intent and potential, but that this is undermined by siloed thinking on equalities and enduring discriminatory behaviour and practices. The paper concludes with propositions for aligning the conceptual links between equality and community empowerment and, thereby, participation in local financial decision-making in practice.",
keywords = "community, equality, gender, outcomes, participation",
author = "Angela O’Hagan and Claire MacRae and {Hill O'Connor}, Clementine and Paul Teedon",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/09540962.2019.1678250",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Money and Management",
issn = "0954-0962",

}

Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland. / O’Hagan, Angela; MacRae, Claire; Hill O'Connor, Clementine; Teedon, Paul.

In: Public Money and Management, 28.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland

AU - O’Hagan, Angela

AU - MacRae, Claire

AU - Hill O'Connor, Clementine

AU - Teedon, Paul

PY - 2019/10/28

Y1 - 2019/10/28

N2 - The institutional engagement and analysis needed to effectively integrate the requirements of equality legislation into participatory budgeting (PB) processes requires a transformational approach. Equality processes appear to exist in parallel with PB activity, rather than being operationalized as integral to the objectives and character of PB activity at local level. This paper proposes that PB and the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in the Equality Act 2010 share a transformative intent and potential, but that this is undermined by siloed thinking on equalities and enduring discriminatory behaviour and practices. The paper concludes with propositions for aligning the conceptual links between equality and community empowerment and, thereby, participation in local financial decision-making in practice.

AB - The institutional engagement and analysis needed to effectively integrate the requirements of equality legislation into participatory budgeting (PB) processes requires a transformational approach. Equality processes appear to exist in parallel with PB activity, rather than being operationalized as integral to the objectives and character of PB activity at local level. This paper proposes that PB and the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in the Equality Act 2010 share a transformative intent and potential, but that this is undermined by siloed thinking on equalities and enduring discriminatory behaviour and practices. The paper concludes with propositions for aligning the conceptual links between equality and community empowerment and, thereby, participation in local financial decision-making in practice.

KW - community

KW - equality

KW - gender

KW - outcomes

KW - participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074600138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://researchonline.gcu.ac.uk/en/publications/participatory-budgeting-community-engagement-and-impact-on-public

U2 - 10.1080/09540962.2019.1678250

DO - 10.1080/09540962.2019.1678250

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074600138

JO - Public Money and Management

JF - Public Money and Management

SN - 0954-0962

ER -