Parsimony and pauperism

poor relief in England, Scotland and Wales in the nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws noted in 1909, the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 and the Poor Law (Scotland) Act of 1845 sprang from rather different motives. Whereas the first Act aimed to restrict the provision of poor relief, the second was designed to enhance it. However, despite these aims, it is generally accepted that Scotland’s Poor Law continued to relieve a smaller proportion of its population and to spend less money on them. This paper revisits the evidence on which these claims are based. Although the gap between the two Poor Laws was less than previously supposed, it was nevertheless substantial. The paper also explores the links between the size of Scottish parishes and welfare spending, and demonstrates that the main reasons for the persistence of the spending gap were related to different levels of investment in poorhouses and workhouses, and support for the elderly.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-74
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Scottish Historical Studies
Volume39
Issue number1
Early online date17 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019

Fingerprint

immiseration
poor relief
poor law
twentieth century
act
workhouse
parish
amendment
persistence
money
welfare
Poor Law
England
Parsimony
Wales
Poor Relief
Scotland
20th century
evidence

Keywords

  • poor relief
  • poor laws
  • poorhouses
  • workhouses
  • Scotland
  • England and Wales

Cite this

@article{f03df1d8b5f745d2b8b0fc49fea2ad83,
title = "Parsimony and pauperism: poor relief in England, Scotland and Wales in the nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries",
abstract = "As the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws noted in 1909, the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 and the Poor Law (Scotland) Act of 1845 sprang from rather different motives. Whereas the first Act aimed to restrict the provision of poor relief, the second was designed to enhance it. However, despite these aims, it is generally accepted that Scotland’s Poor Law continued to relieve a smaller proportion of its population and to spend less money on them. This paper revisits the evidence on which these claims are based. Although the gap between the two Poor Laws was less than previously supposed, it was nevertheless substantial. The paper also explores the links between the size of Scottish parishes and welfare spending, and demonstrates that the main reasons for the persistence of the spending gap were related to different levels of investment in poorhouses and workhouses, and support for the elderly.",
keywords = "poor relief, poor laws, poorhouses, workhouses, Scotland, England and Wales",
author = "Bernard Harris",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3366/jshs.2019.0260",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "40--74",
journal = "Journal of Scottish Historical Studies",
issn = "1748-538X",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parsimony and pauperism

T2 - poor relief in England, Scotland and Wales in the nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries

AU - Harris, Bernard

PY - 2019/5/31

Y1 - 2019/5/31

N2 - As the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws noted in 1909, the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 and the Poor Law (Scotland) Act of 1845 sprang from rather different motives. Whereas the first Act aimed to restrict the provision of poor relief, the second was designed to enhance it. However, despite these aims, it is generally accepted that Scotland’s Poor Law continued to relieve a smaller proportion of its population and to spend less money on them. This paper revisits the evidence on which these claims are based. Although the gap between the two Poor Laws was less than previously supposed, it was nevertheless substantial. The paper also explores the links between the size of Scottish parishes and welfare spending, and demonstrates that the main reasons for the persistence of the spending gap were related to different levels of investment in poorhouses and workhouses, and support for the elderly.

AB - As the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws noted in 1909, the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 and the Poor Law (Scotland) Act of 1845 sprang from rather different motives. Whereas the first Act aimed to restrict the provision of poor relief, the second was designed to enhance it. However, despite these aims, it is generally accepted that Scotland’s Poor Law continued to relieve a smaller proportion of its population and to spend less money on them. This paper revisits the evidence on which these claims are based. Although the gap between the two Poor Laws was less than previously supposed, it was nevertheless substantial. The paper also explores the links between the size of Scottish parishes and welfare spending, and demonstrates that the main reasons for the persistence of the spending gap were related to different levels of investment in poorhouses and workhouses, and support for the elderly.

KW - poor relief

KW - poor laws

KW - poorhouses

KW - workhouses

KW - Scotland

KW - England and Wales

UR - https://www.euppublishing.com/loi/JSHS

U2 - 10.3366/jshs.2019.0260

DO - 10.3366/jshs.2019.0260

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 40

EP - 74

JO - Journal of Scottish Historical Studies

JF - Journal of Scottish Historical Studies

SN - 1748-538X

IS - 1

ER -