Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change?

M.P. Shephard, J.E Owens (Editor), R. Pelizzo (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington prompted a "global war on terror" that led to a significant shift in the balance of executive-legislative power in the United States towards the executive at the expense of the Congress.In this volume, seasoned scholars examine the extent to which terrorist threats and counter-terrorism policies led uniformly to the growth of executive or Government power at the expense of legislatures and parliaments in other political systems, including those of Australia, Britain, Canada, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, and Russia. The contributors question whether the "crises" created by 9/11 and subsequent attacks, led inexorably to executive strengthening at the expense of legislatures and parliaments. The research reported finds that democratic forces served to mitigate changes to the balance of legislative and executive power to varying degrees in different political systems.This book will be of interest to students and researchers of Comparative Government Politics and International Politics.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

parliament
terrorism
political system
executive power
International Politics
Indonesia
Israel
Italy
Russia
Canada
threat
politics
student

Keywords

  • war on terror
  • analysis
  • executive-legislative power

Cite this

Shephard, M. P., Owens, J. E. (Ed.), & Pelizzo, R. (Ed.) (2010). Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change? In The "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis
Shephard, M.P. ; Owens, J.E (Editor) ; Pelizzo, R. (Editor). / Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change?. The "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis. 2010.
@inbook{d45734fd1b3f431a8ee863a285893b55,
title = "Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus {\cC}a Change?",
abstract = "The 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington prompted a {"}global war on terror{"} that led to a significant shift in the balance of executive-legislative power in the United States towards the executive at the expense of the Congress.In this volume, seasoned scholars examine the extent to which terrorist threats and counter-terrorism policies led uniformly to the growth of executive or Government power at the expense of legislatures and parliaments in other political systems, including those of Australia, Britain, Canada, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, and Russia. The contributors question whether the {"}crises{"} created by 9/11 and subsequent attacks, led inexorably to executive strengthening at the expense of legislatures and parliaments. The research reported finds that democratic forces served to mitigate changes to the balance of legislative and executive power to varying degrees in different political systems.This book will be of interest to students and researchers of Comparative Government Politics and International Politics.",
keywords = "war on terror, analysis, executive-legislative power",
author = "M.P. Shephard and J.E Owens and R. Pelizzo",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415489331",
booktitle = "The {"}War on Terror{"} and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis",

}

Shephard, MP, Owens, JE (ed.) & Pelizzo, R (ed.) 2010, Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change? in The "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis.

Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change? / Shephard, M.P.; Owens, J.E (Editor); Pelizzo, R. (Editor).

The "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis. 2010.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change?

AU - Shephard, M.P.

A2 - Owens, J.E

A2 - Pelizzo, R.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington prompted a "global war on terror" that led to a significant shift in the balance of executive-legislative power in the United States towards the executive at the expense of the Congress.In this volume, seasoned scholars examine the extent to which terrorist threats and counter-terrorism policies led uniformly to the growth of executive or Government power at the expense of legislatures and parliaments in other political systems, including those of Australia, Britain, Canada, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, and Russia. The contributors question whether the "crises" created by 9/11 and subsequent attacks, led inexorably to executive strengthening at the expense of legislatures and parliaments. The research reported finds that democratic forces served to mitigate changes to the balance of legislative and executive power to varying degrees in different political systems.This book will be of interest to students and researchers of Comparative Government Politics and International Politics.

AB - The 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington prompted a "global war on terror" that led to a significant shift in the balance of executive-legislative power in the United States towards the executive at the expense of the Congress.In this volume, seasoned scholars examine the extent to which terrorist threats and counter-terrorism policies led uniformly to the growth of executive or Government power at the expense of legislatures and parliaments in other political systems, including those of Australia, Britain, Canada, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, and Russia. The contributors question whether the "crises" created by 9/11 and subsequent attacks, led inexorably to executive strengthening at the expense of legislatures and parliaments. The research reported finds that democratic forces served to mitigate changes to the balance of legislative and executive power to varying degrees in different political systems.This book will be of interest to students and researchers of Comparative Government Politics and International Politics.

KW - war on terror

KW - analysis

KW - executive-legislative power

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780415489331

BT - The "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis

ER -

Shephard MP, Owens JE, (ed.), Pelizzo R, (ed.). Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the British 'War on Terror': Surrendering Power to Parliament or Plus Ça Change? In The "War on Terror" and the Growth of Executive Power?: A Comparative Analysis. 2010