Parallel processes: getting it write?

Ruth Emond, Laura Steckley, Autumn Roesch-Marsh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper offers a critical reflection on the processes surrounding the writing of a book aimed at foster carers and residential workers. By utilising the concept of parallel process as well as the four modes of reflection identified by Ruch (2000), we explore the ways in which the wider context of both direct work with children and reflective practice have been impacted by the tensions between relationally based, child-centred practice and wider managerialist imperatives. The paper draws parallels between these practice tensions and those currently in play within the academy. By employing a dialogical and reflective analysis of the process and interactions surrounding the writing of a practitioner-targeted book, the paper demonstrates the ways in which critical and process reflection post event took place, considering the heretofore unexplored parallel processes between writing for practice, and practice. In so doing, it identifies the ways in which the authors mirrored practitioners in relation to the management of anxiety, a sense of constrained autonomy and confidence, and an avoidance of recognising and challenging structural and political context. Implications for the creation of practice literature and for the academy are considered.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages351-363
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Social Work Practice
    Volume32
    Issue number3
    Early online date30 Nov 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Caregivers
    academy
    Anxiety
    autonomy
    confidence
    anxiety
    worker
    event
    interaction
    management
    literature

    Keywords

    • parallel process
    • writing for practice
    • relationship
    • containment
    • voice

    Cite this

    Emond, Ruth ; Steckley, Laura ; Roesch-Marsh, Autumn. / Parallel processes : getting it write?. In: Journal of Social Work Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 351-363.
    @article{fd85757322c04fc39b08f24ef6d2d286,
    title = "Parallel processes: getting it write?",
    abstract = "This paper offers a critical reflection on the processes surrounding the writing of a book aimed at foster carers and residential workers. By utilising the concept of parallel process as well as the four modes of reflection identified by Ruch (2000), we explore the ways in which the wider context of both direct work with children and reflective practice have been impacted by the tensions between relationally based, child-centred practice and wider managerialist imperatives. The paper draws parallels between these practice tensions and those currently in play within the academy. By employing a dialogical and reflective analysis of the process and interactions surrounding the writing of a practitioner-targeted book, the paper demonstrates the ways in which critical and process reflection post event took place, considering the heretofore unexplored parallel processes between writing for practice, and practice. In so doing, it identifies the ways in which the authors mirrored practitioners in relation to the management of anxiety, a sense of constrained autonomy and confidence, and an avoidance of recognising and challenging structural and political context. Implications for the creation of practice literature and for the academy are considered.",
    keywords = "parallel process, writing for practice, relationship, containment, voice",
    author = "Ruth Emond and Laura Steckley and Autumn Roesch-Marsh",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1080/02650533.2017.1384998",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "351--363",
    journal = "Journal of Social Work Practice",
    issn = "0265-0533",
    number = "3",

    }

    Parallel processes : getting it write? / Emond, Ruth; Steckley, Laura; Roesch-Marsh, Autumn.

    In: Journal of Social Work Practice, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2018, p. 351-363.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Parallel processes

    T2 - Journal of Social Work Practice

    AU - Emond, Ruth

    AU - Steckley, Laura

    AU - Roesch-Marsh, Autumn

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - This paper offers a critical reflection on the processes surrounding the writing of a book aimed at foster carers and residential workers. By utilising the concept of parallel process as well as the four modes of reflection identified by Ruch (2000), we explore the ways in which the wider context of both direct work with children and reflective practice have been impacted by the tensions between relationally based, child-centred practice and wider managerialist imperatives. The paper draws parallels between these practice tensions and those currently in play within the academy. By employing a dialogical and reflective analysis of the process and interactions surrounding the writing of a practitioner-targeted book, the paper demonstrates the ways in which critical and process reflection post event took place, considering the heretofore unexplored parallel processes between writing for practice, and practice. In so doing, it identifies the ways in which the authors mirrored practitioners in relation to the management of anxiety, a sense of constrained autonomy and confidence, and an avoidance of recognising and challenging structural and political context. Implications for the creation of practice literature and for the academy are considered.

    AB - This paper offers a critical reflection on the processes surrounding the writing of a book aimed at foster carers and residential workers. By utilising the concept of parallel process as well as the four modes of reflection identified by Ruch (2000), we explore the ways in which the wider context of both direct work with children and reflective practice have been impacted by the tensions between relationally based, child-centred practice and wider managerialist imperatives. The paper draws parallels between these practice tensions and those currently in play within the academy. By employing a dialogical and reflective analysis of the process and interactions surrounding the writing of a practitioner-targeted book, the paper demonstrates the ways in which critical and process reflection post event took place, considering the heretofore unexplored parallel processes between writing for practice, and practice. In so doing, it identifies the ways in which the authors mirrored practitioners in relation to the management of anxiety, a sense of constrained autonomy and confidence, and an avoidance of recognising and challenging structural and political context. Implications for the creation of practice literature and for the academy are considered.

    KW - parallel process

    KW - writing for practice

    KW - relationship

    KW - containment

    KW - voice

    UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjsw20/current

    U2 - 10.1080/02650533.2017.1384998

    DO - 10.1080/02650533.2017.1384998

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 351

    EP - 363

    JO - Journal of Social Work Practice

    JF - Journal of Social Work Practice

    SN - 0265-0533

    IS - 3

    ER -