Parallel lines? Policy mood in a plurinational democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We usually think of democratic accountability in national terms – if the people do not approve of a government, they can replace it. However, in a plurinational democracy it is not obvious that such a single national public exists. We consider this problem in the case of Scotland, providing the first application of the macro-polity approach to a plurinational democracy. We provide a systematic study of how public opinion in Scotland changes over time compared to that in the rest of Great Britain, using recently developed Bayesian IRT scaling techniques, and ask whether Scottish and British public opinion move in parallel. To the extent that there is a separate Scottish public opinion with a separate party system, this forces us to rethink the way that democracy and accountability work in plurinational political systems.
LanguageEnglish
Pages48-57
Number of pages10
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume58
Early online date12 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

mood
public opinion
democracy
responsibility
party system
scaling
political system
time

Keywords

  • plurinational democracy
  • democratic accountability
  • Scotland
  • public opinion

Cite this

@article{2ca89cf549014daa82197f1eb75c2a63,
title = "Parallel lines? Policy mood in a plurinational democracy",
abstract = "We usually think of democratic accountability in national terms – if the people do not approve of a government, they can replace it. However, in a plurinational democracy it is not obvious that such a single national public exists. We consider this problem in the case of Scotland, providing the first application of the macro-polity approach to a plurinational democracy. We provide a systematic study of how public opinion in Scotland changes over time compared to that in the rest of Great Britain, using recently developed Bayesian IRT scaling techniques, and ask whether Scottish and British public opinion move in parallel. To the extent that there is a separate Scottish public opinion with a separate party system, this forces us to rethink the way that democracy and accountability work in plurinational political systems.",
keywords = "plurinational democracy, democratic accountability, Scotland, public opinion",
author = "Anthony McGann and Sebastian Dellepiane-Avellaneda and John Bartle",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "48--57",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",

}

Parallel lines? Policy mood in a plurinational democracy. / McGann, Anthony; Dellepiane-Avellaneda, Sebastian; Bartle, John.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 58, 01.04.2019, p. 48-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parallel lines? Policy mood in a plurinational democracy

AU - McGann, Anthony

AU - Dellepiane-Avellaneda, Sebastian

AU - Bartle, John

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - We usually think of democratic accountability in national terms – if the people do not approve of a government, they can replace it. However, in a plurinational democracy it is not obvious that such a single national public exists. We consider this problem in the case of Scotland, providing the first application of the macro-polity approach to a plurinational democracy. We provide a systematic study of how public opinion in Scotland changes over time compared to that in the rest of Great Britain, using recently developed Bayesian IRT scaling techniques, and ask whether Scottish and British public opinion move in parallel. To the extent that there is a separate Scottish public opinion with a separate party system, this forces us to rethink the way that democracy and accountability work in plurinational political systems.

AB - We usually think of democratic accountability in national terms – if the people do not approve of a government, they can replace it. However, in a plurinational democracy it is not obvious that such a single national public exists. We consider this problem in the case of Scotland, providing the first application of the macro-polity approach to a plurinational democracy. We provide a systematic study of how public opinion in Scotland changes over time compared to that in the rest of Great Britain, using recently developed Bayesian IRT scaling techniques, and ask whether Scottish and British public opinion move in parallel. To the extent that there is a separate Scottish public opinion with a separate party system, this forces us to rethink the way that democracy and accountability work in plurinational political systems.

KW - plurinational democracy

KW - democratic accountability

KW - Scotland

KW - public opinion

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/electoral-studies

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.005

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 48

EP - 57

JO - Electoral Studies

T2 - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

ER -