Output measurement in the Scottish budget

Arthur Midwinter, Brian Ashcroft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The publication of the new spending plans for Scotland (Scottish Executive 2004a) after the debate on Spending Review 2004 was greeted in journalistic and political circles as but the latest exercise in government spin. The Herald's Scottish political correspondent (Gordon, 2004) inferred that the dropping of 138 targets was part of a Machiavellian exercise of control of information to cloud the process of accountability, and as greater transparency and efficiency in public spending was central to the rationale for targets, then clearly if correct, this was a major issue of public concern. The practice of target-setting by the Executive however, requires the reconsideration of targets in each Spending Review and their replacement as appropriate, whether by more relevant measures or to reflect new priorities. In this case, there was no presentational spin.
LanguageEnglish
Pages12-19
Number of pages8
JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
Volume30
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Exercise
Target setting
Transparency
Government
Replacement
Accountability
Rationale
Scotland
Public spending

Keywords

  • Fraser of Allander Institute
  • Scottish economy
  • Scottish budget

Cite this

Midwinter, Arthur ; Ashcroft, Brian. / Output measurement in the Scottish budget. In: Quarterly Economic Commentary. 2005 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 12-19.
@article{edd249ec005d4142809980b3f5451df5,
title = "Output measurement in the Scottish budget",
abstract = "The publication of the new spending plans for Scotland (Scottish Executive 2004a) after the debate on Spending Review 2004 was greeted in journalistic and political circles as but the latest exercise in government spin. The Herald's Scottish political correspondent (Gordon, 2004) inferred that the dropping of 138 targets was part of a Machiavellian exercise of control of information to cloud the process of accountability, and as greater transparency and efficiency in public spending was central to the rationale for targets, then clearly if correct, this was a major issue of public concern. The practice of target-setting by the Executive however, requires the reconsideration of targets in each Spending Review and their replacement as appropriate, whether by more relevant measures or to reflect new priorities. In this case, there was no presentational spin.",
keywords = "Fraser of Allander Institute, Scottish economy, Scottish budget",
author = "Arthur Midwinter and Brian Ashcroft",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "12--19",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

Output measurement in the Scottish budget. / Midwinter, Arthur; Ashcroft, Brian.

In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 30, No. 1, 06.2005, p. 12-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Output measurement in the Scottish budget

AU - Midwinter, Arthur

AU - Ashcroft, Brian

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - The publication of the new spending plans for Scotland (Scottish Executive 2004a) after the debate on Spending Review 2004 was greeted in journalistic and political circles as but the latest exercise in government spin. The Herald's Scottish political correspondent (Gordon, 2004) inferred that the dropping of 138 targets was part of a Machiavellian exercise of control of information to cloud the process of accountability, and as greater transparency and efficiency in public spending was central to the rationale for targets, then clearly if correct, this was a major issue of public concern. The practice of target-setting by the Executive however, requires the reconsideration of targets in each Spending Review and their replacement as appropriate, whether by more relevant measures or to reflect new priorities. In this case, there was no presentational spin.

AB - The publication of the new spending plans for Scotland (Scottish Executive 2004a) after the debate on Spending Review 2004 was greeted in journalistic and political circles as but the latest exercise in government spin. The Herald's Scottish political correspondent (Gordon, 2004) inferred that the dropping of 138 targets was part of a Machiavellian exercise of control of information to cloud the process of accountability, and as greater transparency and efficiency in public spending was central to the rationale for targets, then clearly if correct, this was a major issue of public concern. The practice of target-setting by the Executive however, requires the reconsideration of targets in each Spending Review and their replacement as appropriate, whether by more relevant measures or to reflect new priorities. In this case, there was no presentational spin.

KW - Fraser of Allander Institute

KW - Scottish economy

KW - Scottish budget

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 12

EP - 19

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -