Ornamental art and symbolism

activators of historical regeneration for Kazakhstan's landscape architecture

Akmaral Yussupova, Liu Songfu, Ardasher Namazbay, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Ahad Nejad Ebrahimi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of symbolism in contemporary architecture is increasingly gaining momentum, especially so in the Eastern countries currently undergoing rapid economic development. Sociologically, this phenomenon can be related to a desire to manifest a vast wealth of national art and respond to the globalisation and unification of world culture. Taking this tendency as a prompt, this study explores different ways of implementing symbolic ornaments in landscape architecture. Traditionally architecture has been defined through and judged against culturally acceptable criteria that set the norm for appropriate form and expression. Yet, technical advances have altered this process and contributed to a certain level of oblivion of traditional architectural form. Thus, the meaning of many Kazakh ornaments has been lost through time. On one hand, this paper collects historical information on the semiotics of Kazakh ornaments and on the other hand, it conducts field studies focusing on the cultural tradition of the native people in Eurasia. The study introduces the use of symbolism in landscape architecture as an aspiration for luck and prosperity which then dictates the quality of the landscape compositions. The findings show that the use of symbolic ornamentation in architecture is not bound to specific geographic areas but rather motivated by broader underlying principles. Through analytical exploration of different cultures and their use of symbols in architecture, this study identifies four main categories of architectural symbolism relating to floral, zoomorphic, geometric and cosmogonic patterns. Each nation then recognises its own identity in the semiotics of those patterns and incorporates them in the urban realm as part of its cultural legacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-213
Number of pages21
JournalArchnet-IJAR
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

symbolism
Semiotics
Kazakhstan
art
regeneration
semiotics
Momentum
prosperity
cultural tradition
Economics
ornamentation
symbol
Chemical analysis
globalization
momentum
economic development
economics
landscape architecture

Keywords

  • cosmogonic
  • floral
  • geometric
  • landscape architecture
  • symbolism
  • zoomorphic

Cite this

Yussupova, Akmaral ; Songfu, Liu ; Namazbay, Ardasher ; Rahimian, Farzad Pour ; Ebrahimi, Ahad Nejad. / Ornamental art and symbolism : activators of historical regeneration for Kazakhstan's landscape architecture. In: Archnet-IJAR. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 193-213.
@article{bd00416dbd62429e9f206eba52d0fc16,
title = "Ornamental art and symbolism: activators of historical regeneration for Kazakhstan's landscape architecture",
abstract = "The use of symbolism in contemporary architecture is increasingly gaining momentum, especially so in the Eastern countries currently undergoing rapid economic development. Sociologically, this phenomenon can be related to a desire to manifest a vast wealth of national art and respond to the globalisation and unification of world culture. Taking this tendency as a prompt, this study explores different ways of implementing symbolic ornaments in landscape architecture. Traditionally architecture has been defined through and judged against culturally acceptable criteria that set the norm for appropriate form and expression. Yet, technical advances have altered this process and contributed to a certain level of oblivion of traditional architectural form. Thus, the meaning of many Kazakh ornaments has been lost through time. On one hand, this paper collects historical information on the semiotics of Kazakh ornaments and on the other hand, it conducts field studies focusing on the cultural tradition of the native people in Eurasia. The study introduces the use of symbolism in landscape architecture as an aspiration for luck and prosperity which then dictates the quality of the landscape compositions. The findings show that the use of symbolic ornamentation in architecture is not bound to specific geographic areas but rather motivated by broader underlying principles. Through analytical exploration of different cultures and their use of symbols in architecture, this study identifies four main categories of architectural symbolism relating to floral, zoomorphic, geometric and cosmogonic patterns. Each nation then recognises its own identity in the semiotics of those patterns and incorporates them in the urban realm as part of its cultural legacy.",
keywords = "cosmogonic, floral, geometric, landscape architecture, symbolism, zoomorphic",
author = "Akmaral Yussupova and Liu Songfu and Ardasher Namazbay and Rahimian, {Farzad Pour} and Ebrahimi, {Ahad Nejad}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1358",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "193--213",
journal = "ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research",
issn = "1938-7806",
number = "3",

}

Ornamental art and symbolism : activators of historical regeneration for Kazakhstan's landscape architecture. / Yussupova, Akmaral; Songfu, Liu; Namazbay, Ardasher; Rahimian, Farzad Pour; Ebrahimi, Ahad Nejad.

In: Archnet-IJAR, Vol. 11, No. 3, 30.11.2017, p. 193-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ornamental art and symbolism

T2 - activators of historical regeneration for Kazakhstan's landscape architecture

AU - Yussupova, Akmaral

AU - Songfu, Liu

AU - Namazbay, Ardasher

AU - Rahimian, Farzad Pour

AU - Ebrahimi, Ahad Nejad

PY - 2017/11/30

Y1 - 2017/11/30

N2 - The use of symbolism in contemporary architecture is increasingly gaining momentum, especially so in the Eastern countries currently undergoing rapid economic development. Sociologically, this phenomenon can be related to a desire to manifest a vast wealth of national art and respond to the globalisation and unification of world culture. Taking this tendency as a prompt, this study explores different ways of implementing symbolic ornaments in landscape architecture. Traditionally architecture has been defined through and judged against culturally acceptable criteria that set the norm for appropriate form and expression. Yet, technical advances have altered this process and contributed to a certain level of oblivion of traditional architectural form. Thus, the meaning of many Kazakh ornaments has been lost through time. On one hand, this paper collects historical information on the semiotics of Kazakh ornaments and on the other hand, it conducts field studies focusing on the cultural tradition of the native people in Eurasia. The study introduces the use of symbolism in landscape architecture as an aspiration for luck and prosperity which then dictates the quality of the landscape compositions. The findings show that the use of symbolic ornamentation in architecture is not bound to specific geographic areas but rather motivated by broader underlying principles. Through analytical exploration of different cultures and their use of symbols in architecture, this study identifies four main categories of architectural symbolism relating to floral, zoomorphic, geometric and cosmogonic patterns. Each nation then recognises its own identity in the semiotics of those patterns and incorporates them in the urban realm as part of its cultural legacy.

AB - The use of symbolism in contemporary architecture is increasingly gaining momentum, especially so in the Eastern countries currently undergoing rapid economic development. Sociologically, this phenomenon can be related to a desire to manifest a vast wealth of national art and respond to the globalisation and unification of world culture. Taking this tendency as a prompt, this study explores different ways of implementing symbolic ornaments in landscape architecture. Traditionally architecture has been defined through and judged against culturally acceptable criteria that set the norm for appropriate form and expression. Yet, technical advances have altered this process and contributed to a certain level of oblivion of traditional architectural form. Thus, the meaning of many Kazakh ornaments has been lost through time. On one hand, this paper collects historical information on the semiotics of Kazakh ornaments and on the other hand, it conducts field studies focusing on the cultural tradition of the native people in Eurasia. The study introduces the use of symbolism in landscape architecture as an aspiration for luck and prosperity which then dictates the quality of the landscape compositions. The findings show that the use of symbolic ornamentation in architecture is not bound to specific geographic areas but rather motivated by broader underlying principles. Through analytical exploration of different cultures and their use of symbols in architecture, this study identifies four main categories of architectural symbolism relating to floral, zoomorphic, geometric and cosmogonic patterns. Each nation then recognises its own identity in the semiotics of those patterns and incorporates them in the urban realm as part of its cultural legacy.

KW - cosmogonic

KW - floral

KW - geometric

KW - landscape architecture

KW - symbolism

KW - zoomorphic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034759646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/index

U2 - 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1358

DO - 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1358

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 193

EP - 213

JO - ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research

JF - ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research

SN - 1938-7806

IS - 3

ER -