Organizational space/time: From imperfect panoptical to heterotopian understanding

George Cairns, Peter McInnes, Phil Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Within the managerial arena the last century can be characterised, or perhaps caricatured, as being concerned with the pursuit of control and efficiency. In this pursuit time and space were treated a priori categories that have been commodified, rationalised and considered deterministically. The last two decades have, however, seen an increasing emphasis on the role of the intangible intellectual, emotional and attitudinal properties of organizations. While organization studies, and theory building, shifted in favour of these intangible factors, mainstream authors, together with many in the managerial community, continue to ignore these studies except where they contribute to establishing further control. Consequently many have critiqued contemporary management practice as exercising total, panoptic control over the time/space of employees. While accepting the rhetorical strength of these studies, we argue that control is necessarily imperfect, as disorder remains immanent in the construction of order and is subject to its own process of becoming. However, the suggested 'imperfect panopticon' itself falsly dichotomizes important aspects of the spatial/temporal experience in placing control against freedom, good against bad. In contrast the conceptualisation of space and time developed in this paper suggests these categories should be understood theoretically as complex and post-rational. We seek to inform an emergent heterotopian theory/practice that embraces complexity and ambiguity, proposing a new perspective that we believe is significant for innovation, knowledge and power.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)126-138
    Number of pages12
    JournalEphemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    theory-practice
    employee
    time
    innovation
    organization
    efficiency
    management
    community
    experience

    Keywords

    • organisations
    • management
    • workplace managment
    • space
    • time

    Cite this

    @article{48d05f5b1b0c4f3cb0ee0883a6a7b5a2,
    title = "Organizational space/time: From imperfect panoptical to heterotopian understanding",
    abstract = "Within the managerial arena the last century can be characterised, or perhaps caricatured, as being concerned with the pursuit of control and efficiency. In this pursuit time and space were treated a priori categories that have been commodified, rationalised and considered deterministically. The last two decades have, however, seen an increasing emphasis on the role of the intangible intellectual, emotional and attitudinal properties of organizations. While organization studies, and theory building, shifted in favour of these intangible factors, mainstream authors, together with many in the managerial community, continue to ignore these studies except where they contribute to establishing further control. Consequently many have critiqued contemporary management practice as exercising total, panoptic control over the time/space of employees. While accepting the rhetorical strength of these studies, we argue that control is necessarily imperfect, as disorder remains immanent in the construction of order and is subject to its own process of becoming. However, the suggested 'imperfect panopticon' itself falsly dichotomizes important aspects of the spatial/temporal experience in placing control against freedom, good against bad. In contrast the conceptualisation of space and time developed in this paper suggests these categories should be understood theoretically as complex and post-rational. We seek to inform an emergent heterotopian theory/practice that embraces complexity and ambiguity, proposing a new perspective that we believe is significant for innovation, knowledge and power.",
    keywords = "organisations, management, workplace managment, space, time",
    author = "George Cairns and Peter McInnes and Phil Roberts",
    year = "2003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "126--138",
    journal = "Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization",
    issn = "1473-2866",
    number = "2",

    }

    Organizational space/time: From imperfect panoptical to heterotopian understanding. / Cairns, George; McInnes, Peter; Roberts, Phil.

    In: Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2003, p. 126-138.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Organizational space/time: From imperfect panoptical to heterotopian understanding

    AU - Cairns, George

    AU - McInnes, Peter

    AU - Roberts, Phil

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - Within the managerial arena the last century can be characterised, or perhaps caricatured, as being concerned with the pursuit of control and efficiency. In this pursuit time and space were treated a priori categories that have been commodified, rationalised and considered deterministically. The last two decades have, however, seen an increasing emphasis on the role of the intangible intellectual, emotional and attitudinal properties of organizations. While organization studies, and theory building, shifted in favour of these intangible factors, mainstream authors, together with many in the managerial community, continue to ignore these studies except where they contribute to establishing further control. Consequently many have critiqued contemporary management practice as exercising total, panoptic control over the time/space of employees. While accepting the rhetorical strength of these studies, we argue that control is necessarily imperfect, as disorder remains immanent in the construction of order and is subject to its own process of becoming. However, the suggested 'imperfect panopticon' itself falsly dichotomizes important aspects of the spatial/temporal experience in placing control against freedom, good against bad. In contrast the conceptualisation of space and time developed in this paper suggests these categories should be understood theoretically as complex and post-rational. We seek to inform an emergent heterotopian theory/practice that embraces complexity and ambiguity, proposing a new perspective that we believe is significant for innovation, knowledge and power.

    AB - Within the managerial arena the last century can be characterised, or perhaps caricatured, as being concerned with the pursuit of control and efficiency. In this pursuit time and space were treated a priori categories that have been commodified, rationalised and considered deterministically. The last two decades have, however, seen an increasing emphasis on the role of the intangible intellectual, emotional and attitudinal properties of organizations. While organization studies, and theory building, shifted in favour of these intangible factors, mainstream authors, together with many in the managerial community, continue to ignore these studies except where they contribute to establishing further control. Consequently many have critiqued contemporary management practice as exercising total, panoptic control over the time/space of employees. While accepting the rhetorical strength of these studies, we argue that control is necessarily imperfect, as disorder remains immanent in the construction of order and is subject to its own process of becoming. However, the suggested 'imperfect panopticon' itself falsly dichotomizes important aspects of the spatial/temporal experience in placing control against freedom, good against bad. In contrast the conceptualisation of space and time developed in this paper suggests these categories should be understood theoretically as complex and post-rational. We seek to inform an emergent heterotopian theory/practice that embraces complexity and ambiguity, proposing a new perspective that we believe is significant for innovation, knowledge and power.

    KW - organisations

    KW - management

    KW - workplace managment

    KW - space

    KW - time

    UR - http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/3-2/3-2cairnsetal.pdf

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    SP - 126

    EP - 138

    JO - Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization

    JF - Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization

    SN - 1473-2866

    IS - 2

    ER -