Opportunism in buyer-supplier exchange: a critical examination of the concept and its implications for theory and practice

Stephen Kelly, Beverly Wagner, John Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Claims that opportunism is widespread in the process of buyer-supplier exchange are commonplace, but direct supporting evidence for such claims is largely absent from the relevant literatures. This paper offers a critique of the treatment of opportunism in supply chains by re-establishing the importance of guile in the concept, and investigates existing published, empirical measures of buyer and supplier opportunistic behaviour. The paper offers evidence that, despite the frequency with which the concept is discussed in the literature and applied in research, and the emphasis given to the risks it generates for
management, opportunism with guile between buyers and suppliers appears to be rare in practice. This paper is the first critical assessment of the concept’s treatment in the Operations Management field, and it argues that practitioners are currently being poorly advised with respect to the phenomenon, as well as drawing conclusions for both practitioners and researchers that differ radically from the prevailing consensus on the subject.
LanguageEnglish
JournalProduction Planning and Control
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 11 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Supply chains
Opportunism
Buyers
Suppliers
Operations management
Supply chain
Opportunistic behavior

Keywords

  • opportunism
  • buyer-supplier exchange
  • crtitique
  • guile

Cite this

@article{9d354637f7ff4697bd395a780abe084a,
title = "Opportunism in buyer-supplier exchange: a critical examination of the concept and its implications for theory and practice",
abstract = "Claims that opportunism is widespread in the process of buyer-supplier exchange are commonplace, but direct supporting evidence for such claims is largely absent from the relevant literatures. This paper offers a critique of the treatment of opportunism in supply chains by re-establishing the importance of guile in the concept, and investigates existing published, empirical measures of buyer and supplier opportunistic behaviour. The paper offers evidence that, despite the frequency with which the concept is discussed in the literature and applied in research, and the emphasis given to the risks it generates formanagement, opportunism with guile between buyers and suppliers appears to be rare in practice. This paper is the first critical assessment of the concept’s treatment in the Operations Management field, and it argues that practitioners are currently being poorly advised with respect to the phenomenon, as well as drawing conclusions for both practitioners and researchers that differ radically from the prevailing consensus on the subject.",
keywords = "opportunism , buyer-supplier exchange, crtitique, guile",
author = "Stephen Kelly and Beverly Wagner and John Ramsay",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "11",
language = "English",
journal = "Production Planning and Control",
issn = "0953-7287",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunism in buyer-supplier exchange

T2 - Production Planning and Control

AU - Kelly, Stephen

AU - Wagner, Beverly

AU - Ramsay, John

PY - 2018/6/11

Y1 - 2018/6/11

N2 - Claims that opportunism is widespread in the process of buyer-supplier exchange are commonplace, but direct supporting evidence for such claims is largely absent from the relevant literatures. This paper offers a critique of the treatment of opportunism in supply chains by re-establishing the importance of guile in the concept, and investigates existing published, empirical measures of buyer and supplier opportunistic behaviour. The paper offers evidence that, despite the frequency with which the concept is discussed in the literature and applied in research, and the emphasis given to the risks it generates formanagement, opportunism with guile between buyers and suppliers appears to be rare in practice. This paper is the first critical assessment of the concept’s treatment in the Operations Management field, and it argues that practitioners are currently being poorly advised with respect to the phenomenon, as well as drawing conclusions for both practitioners and researchers that differ radically from the prevailing consensus on the subject.

AB - Claims that opportunism is widespread in the process of buyer-supplier exchange are commonplace, but direct supporting evidence for such claims is largely absent from the relevant literatures. This paper offers a critique of the treatment of opportunism in supply chains by re-establishing the importance of guile in the concept, and investigates existing published, empirical measures of buyer and supplier opportunistic behaviour. The paper offers evidence that, despite the frequency with which the concept is discussed in the literature and applied in research, and the emphasis given to the risks it generates formanagement, opportunism with guile between buyers and suppliers appears to be rare in practice. This paper is the first critical assessment of the concept’s treatment in the Operations Management field, and it argues that practitioners are currently being poorly advised with respect to the phenomenon, as well as drawing conclusions for both practitioners and researchers that differ radically from the prevailing consensus on the subject.

KW - opportunism

KW - buyer-supplier exchange

KW - crtitique

KW - guile

UR - https://tandfonline.com/toc/tppc20/current

M3 - Article

JO - Production Planning and Control

JF - Production Planning and Control

SN - 0953-7287

ER -