Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs

Elaine Blaxter

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    60 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Discussions and enquiries concerning open access journals and the best way to support the associated costs of OA publishing have increased over the last 12‐18 months at the University of Strathclyde. Much of this discussion has taken place with individual academics or at departmental level, rather than at an institutional level. The Information Services Directorate has participated in some of these interchanges, and is aware that the Library, in particular, is identified by many as being the most likely source of funding and/or possible coordinator of any decision to tackle this matter should a central support policy be put in place. Whilst ISD agree that its field of responsibility should include some involvement with OA publishing, not least due to the support and management of the institutional repository, it is concerned that many of the views being expressed by colleagues elsewhere are showing some evidence that the real workings of the OA enterprise in the wider arena are misunderstood, specifically on the matter of cost. This discussion paper attempts to clear‐up some of the myths and provide an objective assessment of the options this institution may wish to consider.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    open access
    myth
    costs
    information service
    funding
    responsibility
    management
    evidence

    Keywords

    • copyright
    • publishers
    • open access
    • green open access
    • gold open access

    Cite this

    Blaxter, E. (2011). Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs. University of Strathclyde.
    Blaxter, Elaine. / Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs. University of Strathclyde, 2011.
    @techreport{ba37bb4a29ec4f40beb179cfba34892a,
    title = "Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs",
    abstract = "Discussions and enquiries concerning open access journals and the best way to support the associated costs of OA publishing have increased over the last 12‐18 months at the University of Strathclyde. Much of this discussion has taken place with individual academics or at departmental level, rather than at an institutional level. The Information Services Directorate has participated in some of these interchanges, and is aware that the Library, in particular, is identified by many as being the most likely source of funding and/or possible coordinator of any decision to tackle this matter should a central support policy be put in place. Whilst ISD agree that its field of responsibility should include some involvement with OA publishing, not least due to the support and management of the institutional repository, it is concerned that many of the views being expressed by colleagues elsewhere are showing some evidence that the real workings of the OA enterprise in the wider arena are misunderstood, specifically on the matter of cost. This discussion paper attempts to clear‐up some of the myths and provide an objective assessment of the options this institution may wish to consider.",
    keywords = "copyright, publishers, open access, green open access, gold open access",
    author = "Elaine Blaxter",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "University of Strathclyde",

    }

    Blaxter, E 2011 'Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs' University of Strathclyde.

    Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs. / Blaxter, Elaine.

    University of Strathclyde, 2011.

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs

    AU - Blaxter, Elaine

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Discussions and enquiries concerning open access journals and the best way to support the associated costs of OA publishing have increased over the last 12‐18 months at the University of Strathclyde. Much of this discussion has taken place with individual academics or at departmental level, rather than at an institutional level. The Information Services Directorate has participated in some of these interchanges, and is aware that the Library, in particular, is identified by many as being the most likely source of funding and/or possible coordinator of any decision to tackle this matter should a central support policy be put in place. Whilst ISD agree that its field of responsibility should include some involvement with OA publishing, not least due to the support and management of the institutional repository, it is concerned that many of the views being expressed by colleagues elsewhere are showing some evidence that the real workings of the OA enterprise in the wider arena are misunderstood, specifically on the matter of cost. This discussion paper attempts to clear‐up some of the myths and provide an objective assessment of the options this institution may wish to consider.

    AB - Discussions and enquiries concerning open access journals and the best way to support the associated costs of OA publishing have increased over the last 12‐18 months at the University of Strathclyde. Much of this discussion has taken place with individual academics or at departmental level, rather than at an institutional level. The Information Services Directorate has participated in some of these interchanges, and is aware that the Library, in particular, is identified by many as being the most likely source of funding and/or possible coordinator of any decision to tackle this matter should a central support policy be put in place. Whilst ISD agree that its field of responsibility should include some involvement with OA publishing, not least due to the support and management of the institutional repository, it is concerned that many of the views being expressed by colleagues elsewhere are showing some evidence that the real workings of the OA enterprise in the wider arena are misunderstood, specifically on the matter of cost. This discussion paper attempts to clear‐up some of the myths and provide an objective assessment of the options this institution may wish to consider.

    KW - copyright

    KW - publishers

    KW - open access

    KW - green open access

    KW - gold open access

    M3 - Discussion paper

    BT - Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs

    PB - University of Strathclyde

    ER -

    Blaxter E. Open Access (OA) publishing – myths, choices and costs. University of Strathclyde. 2011.