Abstract
Referendums often fail to live up to a deliberative standard, with many characterised by low levels of knowledge, disinterest and misinformation, negativity, and a focus on extraneous issues to which voters are voting. But social media offers new avenues for referendums to incorporate a greater deliberative dimension. Through a content analysis of BBC discussion forums, we test whether online discussion of the Scottish independence referendum has deliberative characteristics. Results suggest a mixed picture with conversation displaying some deliberative features (low incidences of flaming/discussion of referendum issues). However, low levels of discussion intensity, dominance by a few, little knowledge exchange, and high gender inequality illustrate that online referendum discussion lacks deliberative characteristics, implying that social media are not a panacea for referendum deliberation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192–205 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Electoral Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Early online date | 24 Feb 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- referendums
- deliberation
- discussion forums
- Scottish independence
- online content analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Online discussion and the 2014 Scottish independence referendum: flaming keyboards or forums of deliberation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver