Online age verification: government legislation; supplier responsibilization; public perceptions

Chelsea Jarvie, Karen Renaud*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There are widespread concerns about the online harms to children operating online. As such, governments have enacted laws to require online service providers to deploy age verification to prevent such harms. We investigate the following three research questions regarding this topic: (1) To what extent have different governments legislated age verification controls? (2) Do governments embrace a responsibilization strategy when it comes to online age verification? and (3) How does the UK public feel about online age verification legislation? We find that governments are applying a responsibilization strategy, which has led to widespread deployment of privacy-invasive or ineffective age verification. The former violates the privacy of underage users, with the latter undermining the overarching aims of the legislation. We have also found general disengagement and a lack of trust in the government amongst the public with regards to new online age verification laws within the UK. To conclude, despite governments globally looking to put more robust online age verification mechanisms in place, there remains a general lack of privacy preservation and affordable technological solutions. Moreover, the overarching aims of the online safety and age verification legislative changes may not be satisfied due to the general public stakeholder group’s disengagement and lack of trust in their government.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1068
Number of pages25
JournalChildren
Volume11
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • children
  • online harms
  • age verification
  • online service provider responsibilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Online age verification: government legislation; supplier responsibilization; public perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this