On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis

Julian J. Bommer, John Douglas, Frank Scherbaum, Fabrice Cotton, Hilmar Bungum, Donat Fäh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key element in any seismic hazard analysis is the selection of appropriate ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs). In an earlier paper, focused on the selection and adjustment of ground-motion models for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) in moderately active regions—with limited data and few, if any, indigenous models—Cotton et al. (2006) proposed seven criteria as the basis for selecting GMPEs. Recent experience in applying these criteria, faced with several new GMPEs developed since the Cotton et al. (2006) paper was published and a significantly larger strong-motion database, has led to consideration of how the criteria could be refined and of other conditions that could be included to meet the original objectives of Cotton et al. (2006). In fact, about a dozen new GMPEs are published each year, and this number appears to be increasing. Additionally, Cotton et al. (2006) concluded that the criteria should not be excessively specific, tied to the state-of-the-art in ground-motion modeling at the time of writing and thus remaining static, but rather should be sufficiently flexible to be adaptable to the continuing growth of the global strong-motion database and the continued evolution of GMPEs.
LanguageEnglish
Pages783-793
Number of pages11
JournalSeismological Research Letters
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

seismic hazard
ground motion
hazards
cotton
prediction
predictions
strong motion
analysis
adjusting
modeling

Keywords

  • seismic hazard analysis
  • ground-motion prediction equations
  • hazard calculations

Cite this

Bommer, Julian J. ; Douglas, John ; Scherbaum, Frank ; Cotton, Fabrice ; Bungum, Hilmar ; Fäh, Donat. / On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. In: Seismological Research Letters. 2010 ; Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 783-793.
@article{a2f9dc962fd4421dbba1576d91b751c2,
title = "On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis",
abstract = "A key element in any seismic hazard analysis is the selection of appropriate ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs). In an earlier paper, focused on the selection and adjustment of ground-motion models for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) in moderately active regions—with limited data and few, if any, indigenous models—Cotton et al. (2006) proposed seven criteria as the basis for selecting GMPEs. Recent experience in applying these criteria, faced with several new GMPEs developed since the Cotton et al. (2006) paper was published and a significantly larger strong-motion database, has led to consideration of how the criteria could be refined and of other conditions that could be included to meet the original objectives of Cotton et al. (2006). In fact, about a dozen new GMPEs are published each year, and this number appears to be increasing. Additionally, Cotton et al. (2006) concluded that the criteria should not be excessively specific, tied to the state-of-the-art in ground-motion modeling at the time of writing and thus remaining static, but rather should be sufficiently flexible to be adaptable to the continuing growth of the global strong-motion database and the continued evolution of GMPEs.",
keywords = "seismic hazard analysis, ground-motion prediction equations, hazard calculations",
author = "Bommer, {Julian J.} and John Douglas and Frank Scherbaum and Fabrice Cotton and Hilmar Bungum and Donat F{\"a}h",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1785/gssrl.81.5.783",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "783--793",
journal = "Seismological Research Letters",
issn = "0895-0695",
number = "5",

}

On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. / Bommer, Julian J.; Douglas, John; Scherbaum, Frank; Cotton, Fabrice; Bungum, Hilmar; Fäh, Donat.

In: Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 81, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 783-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis

AU - Bommer, Julian J.

AU - Douglas, John

AU - Scherbaum, Frank

AU - Cotton, Fabrice

AU - Bungum, Hilmar

AU - Fäh, Donat

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - A key element in any seismic hazard analysis is the selection of appropriate ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs). In an earlier paper, focused on the selection and adjustment of ground-motion models for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) in moderately active regions—with limited data and few, if any, indigenous models—Cotton et al. (2006) proposed seven criteria as the basis for selecting GMPEs. Recent experience in applying these criteria, faced with several new GMPEs developed since the Cotton et al. (2006) paper was published and a significantly larger strong-motion database, has led to consideration of how the criteria could be refined and of other conditions that could be included to meet the original objectives of Cotton et al. (2006). In fact, about a dozen new GMPEs are published each year, and this number appears to be increasing. Additionally, Cotton et al. (2006) concluded that the criteria should not be excessively specific, tied to the state-of-the-art in ground-motion modeling at the time of writing and thus remaining static, but rather should be sufficiently flexible to be adaptable to the continuing growth of the global strong-motion database and the continued evolution of GMPEs.

AB - A key element in any seismic hazard analysis is the selection of appropriate ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs). In an earlier paper, focused on the selection and adjustment of ground-motion models for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) in moderately active regions—with limited data and few, if any, indigenous models—Cotton et al. (2006) proposed seven criteria as the basis for selecting GMPEs. Recent experience in applying these criteria, faced with several new GMPEs developed since the Cotton et al. (2006) paper was published and a significantly larger strong-motion database, has led to consideration of how the criteria could be refined and of other conditions that could be included to meet the original objectives of Cotton et al. (2006). In fact, about a dozen new GMPEs are published each year, and this number appears to be increasing. Additionally, Cotton et al. (2006) concluded that the criteria should not be excessively specific, tied to the state-of-the-art in ground-motion modeling at the time of writing and thus remaining static, but rather should be sufficiently flexible to be adaptable to the continuing growth of the global strong-motion database and the continued evolution of GMPEs.

KW - seismic hazard analysis

KW - ground-motion prediction equations

KW - hazard calculations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957598063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1785/gssrl.81.5.783

DO - 10.1785/gssrl.81.5.783

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 783

EP - 793

JO - Seismological Research Letters

T2 - Seismological Research Letters

JF - Seismological Research Letters

SN - 0895-0695

IS - 5

ER -