TY - JOUR
T1 - On the security of machine learning in malware C&C detection
T2 - a survey
AU - Gardiner, Joseph
AU - Nagaraja, Shishir
N1 - © ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in ACM Computing Surveys. 2016 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/003816
PY - 2016/12/31
Y1 - 2016/12/31
N2 - One of the main challenges in security today is defending against malware attacks. As trends and anecdotal evidence show, preventing these attacks, regardless of their indiscriminate or targeted nature, has proven difficult: intrusions happen and devices get compromised, even at security-conscious organizations. As a consequence, an alternative line of work has focused on detecting and disrupting the individual steps that follow an initial compromise and are essential for the successful progression of the attack. In particular, several approaches and techniques have been proposed to identify the command and control (C&C) channel that a compromised system establishes to communicate with its controller. A major oversight of many of these detection techniques is the design's resilience to evasion attempts by the well-motivated attacker. C&C detection techniques make widespread use of a machine learning (ML) component. Therefore, to analyze the evasion resilience of these detection techniques, we first systematize works in the field of C&C detection and then, using existing models from the literature, go on to systematize attacks against the ML components used in these approaches. © 2016 ACM 0360-0300/2016/12-ART59 $15.00.
AB - One of the main challenges in security today is defending against malware attacks. As trends and anecdotal evidence show, preventing these attacks, regardless of their indiscriminate or targeted nature, has proven difficult: intrusions happen and devices get compromised, even at security-conscious organizations. As a consequence, an alternative line of work has focused on detecting and disrupting the individual steps that follow an initial compromise and are essential for the successful progression of the attack. In particular, several approaches and techniques have been proposed to identify the command and control (C&C) channel that a compromised system establishes to communicate with its controller. A major oversight of many of these detection techniques is the design's resilience to evasion attempts by the well-motivated attacker. C&C detection techniques make widespread use of a machine learning (ML) component. Therefore, to analyze the evasion resilience of these detection techniques, we first systematize works in the field of C&C detection and then, using existing models from the literature, go on to systematize attacks against the ML components used in these approaches. © 2016 ACM 0360-0300/2016/12-ART59 $15.00.
KW - botnets
KW - command and control channels
KW - data mining
KW - machine learning
KW - network intrusion
KW - artificial intelligence
U2 - 10.1145/3003816
DO - 10.1145/3003816
M3 - Article
SN - 0360-0300
VL - 49
JO - ACM Computing Surveys
JF - ACM Computing Surveys
IS - 3
M1 - 59
ER -