On the common occurrence of sulphate with elevated δ34S in European mine waters: sulphides, evaporites or seawater?

David Banks, Adrian J. Boyce, Neil M. Burnside, Ewa Janson, Nieves Roqueñi Gutierrez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The stable isotopic (δ34S, δ18O, δ2H) composition of mine waters has been examined from coal and metal mines, of varying depth, in Spain (Asturias), the UK (north Derbyshire/Yorkshire) and Poland (Bytom, Upper Silesia). δ18O and δ2H data confirm a meteoric origin for all waters. The mine waters have elevated sulphate concentrations relative to recent meteorically-derived groundwaters and have elevated SO42−/Cl ratios relative to marine water. In the shallower mines and Markham No. 3, the dissolved sulphate δ34S is low, suggesting the sulphate is derived from the oxidation of sulphide minerals. In most of the deeper mines, the dissolved sulphate δ34S is too high (>15‰), to be derived from simple pyrite oxidation. In the deep Polish and Spanish mine waters, the source of sulphate may be evaporite mineral dissolution, but such a mechanism is problematic in the case of the Caphouse (UK) mine. Fractionation associated with sulphate reduction may have contributed to elevated dissolved sulphate δ34S. Elevated sulphate in deep coal mine waters may not always be simply derived from pyrite oxidation. The consistent observation of elevated dissolved sulphate δ34S in deep coal mines suggests a distinct genetic pathway, the origin of which as yet remains equivocal.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103619
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Coal Geology
Volume232
Early online date14 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • evaporite
  • galena
  • mine water
  • seawater
  • stable isotopes
  • sulphate
  • sulphide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the common occurrence of sulphate with elevated δ<sup>34</sup>S in European mine waters: sulphides, evaporites or seawater?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this