Obesity Prevention Policy

from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime?

Donley Studlar, Paul Cairney

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

81 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There has been increasing attention paid to non-communicable disease risk factors including tobacco, diet, alcohol and a lack of physical activity. The tobacco control model has moved from largely supply side, ‘harm regulation’ measures of the 1950s and 1960s (e.g. ‘safe’ cigarettes, education, self-regulation) to demand side, neo-prohibitionism in the 1980s (e.g. mandatory restrictions) with the increased attention paid to second hand smoke issues. Obesity as well as alcohol remain in the ‘harm regulation’ model although there have been attempts to move toward a more demand side model. Despite the attractiveness of the tobacco control model for obesity policy change, progress has been slow. We analyse the prospects for moving obesity policy towards a neo-prohibitionist model.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Obesity
regime
regulation
nicotine
Alcohols
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Tobacco Products
alcohol
Diet
demand
Education
self-regulation
social attraction
Disease
lack
education

Keywords

  • harm regulation
  • obesity crisis
  • obesity policy
  • neo-prohibitionist model
  • non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

Cite this

Studlar, D., & Cairney, P. (2015). Obesity Prevention Policy: from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime? Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Studlar, Donley ; Cairney, Paul. / Obesity Prevention Policy : from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime?. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2015. 11 p.
@book{f79997227f5b4fdfa824ff87551ccae0,
title = "Obesity Prevention Policy: from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime?",
abstract = "There has been increasing attention paid to non-communicable disease risk factors including tobacco, diet, alcohol and a lack of physical activity. The tobacco control model has moved from largely supply side, ‘harm regulation’ measures of the 1950s and 1960s (e.g. ‘safe’ cigarettes, education, self-regulation) to demand side, neo-prohibitionism in the 1980s (e.g. mandatory restrictions) with the increased attention paid to second hand smoke issues. Obesity as well as alcohol remain in the ‘harm regulation’ model although there have been attempts to move toward a more demand side model. Despite the attractiveness of the tobacco control model for obesity policy change, progress has been slow. We analyse the prospects for moving obesity policy towards a neo-prohibitionist model.",
keywords = "harm regulation, obesity crisis, obesity policy, neo-prohibitionist model, non-communicable diseases (NCDs)",
author = "Donley Studlar and Paul Cairney",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Studlar, D & Cairney, P 2015, Obesity Prevention Policy: from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime? University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

Obesity Prevention Policy : from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime? / Studlar, Donley; Cairney, Paul.

Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2015. 11 p.

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Obesity Prevention Policy

T2 - from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime?

AU - Studlar, Donley

AU - Cairney, Paul

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - There has been increasing attention paid to non-communicable disease risk factors including tobacco, diet, alcohol and a lack of physical activity. The tobacco control model has moved from largely supply side, ‘harm regulation’ measures of the 1950s and 1960s (e.g. ‘safe’ cigarettes, education, self-regulation) to demand side, neo-prohibitionism in the 1980s (e.g. mandatory restrictions) with the increased attention paid to second hand smoke issues. Obesity as well as alcohol remain in the ‘harm regulation’ model although there have been attempts to move toward a more demand side model. Despite the attractiveness of the tobacco control model for obesity policy change, progress has been slow. We analyse the prospects for moving obesity policy towards a neo-prohibitionist model.

AB - There has been increasing attention paid to non-communicable disease risk factors including tobacco, diet, alcohol and a lack of physical activity. The tobacco control model has moved from largely supply side, ‘harm regulation’ measures of the 1950s and 1960s (e.g. ‘safe’ cigarettes, education, self-regulation) to demand side, neo-prohibitionism in the 1980s (e.g. mandatory restrictions) with the increased attention paid to second hand smoke issues. Obesity as well as alcohol remain in the ‘harm regulation’ model although there have been attempts to move toward a more demand side model. Despite the attractiveness of the tobacco control model for obesity policy change, progress has been slow. We analyse the prospects for moving obesity policy towards a neo-prohibitionist model.

KW - harm regulation

KW - obesity crisis

KW - obesity policy

KW - neo-prohibitionist model

KW - non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

M3 - Other report

BT - Obesity Prevention Policy

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Studlar D, Cairney P. Obesity Prevention Policy: from Harm Regulation towards a Neo-Prohibitionist Regime? Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 2015. 11 p.