Note on the inclusion of site classification information in equations to estimate strong ground motions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two main regression methods have been proposed for using site category information within ground motion prediction equations, these are: (a) joint estimation of the site category coefficients and the magnitude and distance coefficients; or (b) estimation of site category coefficients by using the residuals from the equation derived without considering soil conditions. Method (a) requires each record be assigned a site category whereas for method (b), because it relies on residuals, site information can be missing for some records. This short note finds that if the mean of the transformed distances within each site category is the same then the two methods give the same site coefficients. If, however, these means are significantly different then method (b) can yield incorrect site coefficients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-380
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Earthquake Engineering
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003

Fingerprint

ground motion
Soils
method
prediction

Keywords

  • attenuation relationships
  • ground motion estimation equations
  • regression techniques
  • strong ground motion

Cite this

@article{85c27f9b4ca44466affbfe4da38c20d4,
title = "Note on the inclusion of site classification information in equations to estimate strong ground motions",
abstract = "Two main regression methods have been proposed for using site category information within ground motion prediction equations, these are: (a) joint estimation of the site category coefficients and the magnitude and distance coefficients; or (b) estimation of site category coefficients by using the residuals from the equation derived without considering soil conditions. Method (a) requires each record be assigned a site category whereas for method (b), because it relies on residuals, site information can be missing for some records. This short note finds that if the mean of the transformed distances within each site category is the same then the two methods give the same site coefficients. If, however, these means are significantly different then method (b) can yield incorrect site coefficients.",
keywords = "attenuation relationships, ground motion estimation equations, regression techniques, strong ground motion",
author = "John Douglas",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1142/S1363246903001243",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "373--380",
journal = "Journal of Earthquake Engineering",
issn = "1363-2469",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Note on the inclusion of site classification information in equations to estimate strong ground motions

AU - Douglas, John

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Two main regression methods have been proposed for using site category information within ground motion prediction equations, these are: (a) joint estimation of the site category coefficients and the magnitude and distance coefficients; or (b) estimation of site category coefficients by using the residuals from the equation derived without considering soil conditions. Method (a) requires each record be assigned a site category whereas for method (b), because it relies on residuals, site information can be missing for some records. This short note finds that if the mean of the transformed distances within each site category is the same then the two methods give the same site coefficients. If, however, these means are significantly different then method (b) can yield incorrect site coefficients.

AB - Two main regression methods have been proposed for using site category information within ground motion prediction equations, these are: (a) joint estimation of the site category coefficients and the magnitude and distance coefficients; or (b) estimation of site category coefficients by using the residuals from the equation derived without considering soil conditions. Method (a) requires each record be assigned a site category whereas for method (b), because it relies on residuals, site information can be missing for some records. This short note finds that if the mean of the transformed distances within each site category is the same then the two methods give the same site coefficients. If, however, these means are significantly different then method (b) can yield incorrect site coefficients.

KW - attenuation relationships

KW - ground motion estimation equations

KW - regression techniques

KW - strong ground motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346948488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/jee

U2 - 10.1142/S1363246903001243

DO - 10.1142/S1363246903001243

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 373

EP - 380

JO - Journal of Earthquake Engineering

JF - Journal of Earthquake Engineering

SN - 1363-2469

IS - 3

ER -