Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD

Jacques Melitz

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

Official adjustments of the budget balance to the cycle merely assume that the only category of government spending that responds automatically to the cycle is unemployment compensation. But estimates show otherwise. Payments for pensions, health, subsistence, invalidity, child care and subsidies of all sorts to firms respond automatically and significantly to the cycle as well. In addition, it is fairly common to borrow official figures for cyclically adjusted budget balances, divide by potential output, and then use the resulting ratios to study discretionary fiscal policy. But if potential output is not deterministic but subject to supply shocks, then apart from anything else, those ratios are inefficient estimates of the cyclically-independent ratios of budget balances divided by potential output. (A fortiori, they are inefficient estimates of the cyclically adjusted ratios of budget balances to observed output.) Accordingly, the paper provides separate estimates of the impact of the cycle on the levels of budget balances and the ratios of budget balances to output. In addition, it discusses the relation between the two sorts of estimates. When the focus is on ratios of budget balances to output, the cyclical adjustments depend more on inertia in government spending on goods and services than they do on taxes (which are largely proportional to output). But they depend even still more on transfer payments. Besides calling for different series for discretionary fiscal policy if ratios serve, these results also raise questions about the general policy advice to 'let the automatic stabilizers work.'
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-30
Number of pages31
Volume05
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Budget balance
Fiscal policy
Potential output
Government spending
Pensions
Unemployment compensation
Transfer payments
Supply shocks
Policy advice
Child care
Automatic stabilizers
Health
Subsidies
Subsistence
Inertia
Payment
Tax

Keywords

  • automatic stabilization
  • discretionary fiscal policy
  • cyclically adjusted budget balances

Cite this

Melitz, J. (2005). Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD. (03 ed.) (pp. 1-30). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Melitz, Jacques. / Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD. 03. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2005. pp. 1-30
@techreport{3c9bde080b0743b2afe1da93450c578b,
title = "Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD",
abstract = "Official adjustments of the budget balance to the cycle merely assume that the only category of government spending that responds automatically to the cycle is unemployment compensation. But estimates show otherwise. Payments for pensions, health, subsistence, invalidity, child care and subsidies of all sorts to firms respond automatically and significantly to the cycle as well. In addition, it is fairly common to borrow official figures for cyclically adjusted budget balances, divide by potential output, and then use the resulting ratios to study discretionary fiscal policy. But if potential output is not deterministic but subject to supply shocks, then apart from anything else, those ratios are inefficient estimates of the cyclically-independent ratios of budget balances divided by potential output. (A fortiori, they are inefficient estimates of the cyclically adjusted ratios of budget balances to observed output.) Accordingly, the paper provides separate estimates of the impact of the cycle on the levels of budget balances and the ratios of budget balances to output. In addition, it discusses the relation between the two sorts of estimates. When the focus is on ratios of budget balances to output, the cyclical adjustments depend more on inertia in government spending on goods and services than they do on taxes (which are largely proportional to output). But they depend even still more on transfer payments. Besides calling for different series for discretionary fiscal policy if ratios serve, these results also raise questions about the general policy advice to 'let the automatic stabilizers work.'",
keywords = "automatic stabilization, discretionary fiscal policy, cyclically adjusted budget balances",
author = "Jacques Melitz",
note = "Discussion paper.",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "05",
pages = "1--30",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
edition = "03",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Melitz, J 2005 'Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD' 03 edn, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 1-30.

Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD. / Melitz, Jacques.

03. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2005. p. 1-30.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD

AU - Melitz, Jacques

N1 - Discussion paper.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Official adjustments of the budget balance to the cycle merely assume that the only category of government spending that responds automatically to the cycle is unemployment compensation. But estimates show otherwise. Payments for pensions, health, subsistence, invalidity, child care and subsidies of all sorts to firms respond automatically and significantly to the cycle as well. In addition, it is fairly common to borrow official figures for cyclically adjusted budget balances, divide by potential output, and then use the resulting ratios to study discretionary fiscal policy. But if potential output is not deterministic but subject to supply shocks, then apart from anything else, those ratios are inefficient estimates of the cyclically-independent ratios of budget balances divided by potential output. (A fortiori, they are inefficient estimates of the cyclically adjusted ratios of budget balances to observed output.) Accordingly, the paper provides separate estimates of the impact of the cycle on the levels of budget balances and the ratios of budget balances to output. In addition, it discusses the relation between the two sorts of estimates. When the focus is on ratios of budget balances to output, the cyclical adjustments depend more on inertia in government spending on goods and services than they do on taxes (which are largely proportional to output). But they depend even still more on transfer payments. Besides calling for different series for discretionary fiscal policy if ratios serve, these results also raise questions about the general policy advice to 'let the automatic stabilizers work.'

AB - Official adjustments of the budget balance to the cycle merely assume that the only category of government spending that responds automatically to the cycle is unemployment compensation. But estimates show otherwise. Payments for pensions, health, subsistence, invalidity, child care and subsidies of all sorts to firms respond automatically and significantly to the cycle as well. In addition, it is fairly common to borrow official figures for cyclically adjusted budget balances, divide by potential output, and then use the resulting ratios to study discretionary fiscal policy. But if potential output is not deterministic but subject to supply shocks, then apart from anything else, those ratios are inefficient estimates of the cyclically-independent ratios of budget balances divided by potential output. (A fortiori, they are inefficient estimates of the cyclically adjusted ratios of budget balances to observed output.) Accordingly, the paper provides separate estimates of the impact of the cycle on the levels of budget balances and the ratios of budget balances to output. In addition, it discusses the relation between the two sorts of estimates. When the focus is on ratios of budget balances to output, the cyclical adjustments depend more on inertia in government spending on goods and services than they do on taxes (which are largely proportional to output). But they depend even still more on transfer payments. Besides calling for different series for discretionary fiscal policy if ratios serve, these results also raise questions about the general policy advice to 'let the automatic stabilizers work.'

KW - automatic stabilization

KW - discretionary fiscal policy

KW - cyclically adjusted budget balances

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 05

SP - 1

EP - 30

BT - Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Melitz J. Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD. 03 ed. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. 2005 Mar, p. 1-30.