Non deteriministic planning with evidence and paradoxical reasoning theories

Matteo Ceriotti, Massimiliano Vasile, Giovanni Giardini, Mauro Massari

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Planetary exploration rovers require high level of autonomy: they should act as much as possible without human intervention. Nevertheless, there are intrinsic uncertainties on activity duration, position of the rover, and other environment characteristics, like soil condition, dust on solar panels, temperature, etc.: disregarding them during planning would bring unreliable plans. A novel, non-deterministic planning approach for autonomous rovers will be presented. Epistemic uncertainties in the models and errors are taken into account in the planning process in order to prevent failures. For each plan, reliability is computed and used to predict the safest one, by means of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. In addition, the rover has been endowed with the capability of reallocating its goals. By data-fusing payload and navigation information, it assigns interest values to the existing goals or generates new goals. In this way the planner can choose the most interesting scientific objectives to be analyzed, with limited human intervention, and reallocates its goals autonomously. Dezert-Smarandache Theory of Plausible and Paradoxical Reasoning has been used for information fusion. Finally, some applications to the generation of reliable plans are shown. These tests demonstrate how the planner is able to generate plans that maximize both the reliability and the level of interest.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2006
EventAIAA 57th International Astronautical Congress - Valencia, Spain
Duration: 2 Oct 20066 Oct 2006

Conference

ConferenceAIAA 57th International Astronautical Congress
CountrySpain
CityValencia
Period2/10/066/10/06

Keywords

  • planetary exploration rovers
  • non-deterministic planning approach
  • epistemic uncertainties
  • dempster-shafer theory of evidence
  • dezert-smarandache theory
  • plausible reasoning
  • paradoxical reasoning
  • information fusion

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Non deteriministic planning with evidence and paradoxical reasoning theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this