No-fault compensation for medical accidents

Kenneth Norrie, Robert Hendry

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

A discussion of the work of the Scottish Government's No Fault Compensation Group.Medical practice, like any other human activity, sometimes
leads to accidents, or unusual complications, or unexpected results. Usually no one is to blame; sometimes someone is at fault. If the patient has been
harmed, and the doctor’s act (or failure to act) amounts to what the law calls ‘negligence’, then the patient may seek monetary compensation for the injury they have suffered. Yet any patient who emerges from medical
treatment with an injury he or she did not have before the treatment needs care for that injury, whether or not the doctor was negligent, or the negligence caused the injury, or the patient can prove negligence and causation
to a sufficient legal standard. The current system of compensation provides high levels of compensation for some patients injured in the course of medical treatment, and no compensation at all for most.
LanguageEnglish
Pages290-291
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

physician's care
Compensation and Redress
Accidents
accident
Malpractice
need for care
medical practice
Wounds and Injuries
Law
Human Activities
Group
Causality
Therapeutics
Fault
Negligence
Medical Treatment
Doctors

Keywords

  • medical negligence
  • no fault compensation

Cite this

@article{f549982c5c444385948bb11e3d814b17,
title = "No-fault compensation for medical accidents",
abstract = "A discussion of the work of the Scottish Government's No Fault Compensation Group.Medical practice, like any other human activity, sometimes leads to accidents, or unusual complications, or unexpected results. Usually no one is to blame; sometimes someone is at fault. If the patient has been harmed, and the doctor’s act (or failure to act) amounts to what the law calls ‘negligence’, then the patient may seek monetary compensation for the injury they have suffered. Yet any patient who emerges from medical treatment with an injury he or she did not have before the treatment needs care for that injury, whether or not the doctor was negligent, or the negligence caused the injury, or the patient can prove negligence and causation to a sufficient legal standard. The current system of compensation provides high levels of compensation for some patients injured in the course of medical treatment, and no compensation at all for most.",
keywords = "medical negligence, no fault compensation",
author = "Kenneth Norrie and Robert Hendry",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.4997/JRCPE.2011.40",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "290--291",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
issn = "1478-2715",
publisher = "Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
number = "4",

}

No-fault compensation for medical accidents. / Norrie, Kenneth; Hendry, Robert.

In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Vol. 41, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 290-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - No-fault compensation for medical accidents

AU - Norrie, Kenneth

AU - Hendry, Robert

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - A discussion of the work of the Scottish Government's No Fault Compensation Group.Medical practice, like any other human activity, sometimes leads to accidents, or unusual complications, or unexpected results. Usually no one is to blame; sometimes someone is at fault. If the patient has been harmed, and the doctor’s act (or failure to act) amounts to what the law calls ‘negligence’, then the patient may seek monetary compensation for the injury they have suffered. Yet any patient who emerges from medical treatment with an injury he or she did not have before the treatment needs care for that injury, whether or not the doctor was negligent, or the negligence caused the injury, or the patient can prove negligence and causation to a sufficient legal standard. The current system of compensation provides high levels of compensation for some patients injured in the course of medical treatment, and no compensation at all for most.

AB - A discussion of the work of the Scottish Government's No Fault Compensation Group.Medical practice, like any other human activity, sometimes leads to accidents, or unusual complications, or unexpected results. Usually no one is to blame; sometimes someone is at fault. If the patient has been harmed, and the doctor’s act (or failure to act) amounts to what the law calls ‘negligence’, then the patient may seek monetary compensation for the injury they have suffered. Yet any patient who emerges from medical treatment with an injury he or she did not have before the treatment needs care for that injury, whether or not the doctor was negligent, or the negligence caused the injury, or the patient can prove negligence and causation to a sufficient legal standard. The current system of compensation provides high levels of compensation for some patients injured in the course of medical treatment, and no compensation at all for most.

KW - medical negligence

KW - no fault compensation

U2 - 10.4997/JRCPE.2011.40

DO - 10.4997/JRCPE.2011.40

M3 - Editorial

VL - 41

SP - 290

EP - 291

JO - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

T2 - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

JF - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

SN - 1478-2715

IS - 4

ER -