New routes to the PhD: cause for concern?

Bill Johnston, Rowena Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recent developments suggest that the PhD is at a turning point. Professional groups have criticised the so-called 'traditional PhD'. New routes to the PhD are proposed by several bodies and endorsed by one funding council. In light of these developments, it is appropriate to ask what the implications are for the PhD and for the academy. A focus group was used to gather student responses to these developments. The findings show qualified support: students agree that the PhD should cater for different careers but challenge what they see as a simplistic channelling of PhD routes. This paper demonstrates apparent consensus on the need for change in the PhD and reveals movement beyond reconceptualisation towards reconstruction. However, we argue that there is cause for concern in the lack of attention paid to student views and the continuing neglect of quality issues in the PhD.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages31-42
    Number of pages11
    JournalHigher Education Quarterly
    Volume58
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004

    Fingerprint

    cause
    student
    academy
    neglect
    reconstruction
    Group
    funding
    career
    lack

    Keywords

    • PhD
    • education
    • careers
    • quality management

    Cite this

    Johnston, Bill ; Murray, Rowena. / New routes to the PhD: cause for concern?. In: Higher Education Quarterly. 2004 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 31-42.
    @article{2904c8d9bb0e4c4085725b113d2af0bc,
    title = "New routes to the PhD: cause for concern?",
    abstract = "Recent developments suggest that the PhD is at a turning point. Professional groups have criticised the so-called 'traditional PhD'. New routes to the PhD are proposed by several bodies and endorsed by one funding council. In light of these developments, it is appropriate to ask what the implications are for the PhD and for the academy. A focus group was used to gather student responses to these developments. The findings show qualified support: students agree that the PhD should cater for different careers but challenge what they see as a simplistic channelling of PhD routes. This paper demonstrates apparent consensus on the need for change in the PhD and reveals movement beyond reconceptualisation towards reconstruction. However, we argue that there is cause for concern in the lack of attention paid to student views and the continuing neglect of quality issues in the PhD.",
    keywords = "PhD, education, careers, quality management",
    author = "Bill Johnston and Rowena Murray",
    year = "2004",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00258.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "58",
    pages = "31--42",
    journal = "Higher Education Quarterly",
    issn = "0951-5224",
    number = "1",

    }

    New routes to the PhD: cause for concern? / Johnston, Bill; Murray, Rowena.

    In: Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 31-42.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - New routes to the PhD: cause for concern?

    AU - Johnston, Bill

    AU - Murray, Rowena

    PY - 2004/1

    Y1 - 2004/1

    N2 - Recent developments suggest that the PhD is at a turning point. Professional groups have criticised the so-called 'traditional PhD'. New routes to the PhD are proposed by several bodies and endorsed by one funding council. In light of these developments, it is appropriate to ask what the implications are for the PhD and for the academy. A focus group was used to gather student responses to these developments. The findings show qualified support: students agree that the PhD should cater for different careers but challenge what they see as a simplistic channelling of PhD routes. This paper demonstrates apparent consensus on the need for change in the PhD and reveals movement beyond reconceptualisation towards reconstruction. However, we argue that there is cause for concern in the lack of attention paid to student views and the continuing neglect of quality issues in the PhD.

    AB - Recent developments suggest that the PhD is at a turning point. Professional groups have criticised the so-called 'traditional PhD'. New routes to the PhD are proposed by several bodies and endorsed by one funding council. In light of these developments, it is appropriate to ask what the implications are for the PhD and for the academy. A focus group was used to gather student responses to these developments. The findings show qualified support: students agree that the PhD should cater for different careers but challenge what they see as a simplistic channelling of PhD routes. This paper demonstrates apparent consensus on the need for change in the PhD and reveals movement beyond reconceptualisation towards reconstruction. However, we argue that there is cause for concern in the lack of attention paid to student views and the continuing neglect of quality issues in the PhD.

    KW - PhD

    KW - education

    KW - careers

    KW - quality management

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00258.x

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00258.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00258.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 58

    SP - 31

    EP - 42

    JO - Higher Education Quarterly

    T2 - Higher Education Quarterly

    JF - Higher Education Quarterly

    SN - 0951-5224

    IS - 1

    ER -