New routes to the PhD: cause for concern?

Bill Johnston, Rowena Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)


    Recent developments suggest that the PhD is at a turning point. Professional groups have criticised the so-called 'traditional PhD'. New routes to the PhD are proposed by several bodies and endorsed by one funding council. In light of these developments, it is appropriate to ask what the implications are for the PhD and for the academy. A focus group was used to gather student responses to these developments. The findings show qualified support: students agree that the PhD should cater for different careers but challenge what they see as a simplistic channelling of PhD routes. This paper demonstrates apparent consensus on the need for change in the PhD and reveals movement beyond reconceptualisation towards reconstruction. However, we argue that there is cause for concern in the lack of attention paid to student views and the continuing neglect of quality issues in the PhD.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)31-42
    Number of pages11
    JournalHigher Education Quarterly
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004


    • PhD
    • education
    • careers
    • quality management


    Dive into the research topics of 'New routes to the PhD: cause for concern?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this