New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: the role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects

Jo Saunders, Malcolm MacLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extending recent work that has demonstrated that the act of remembering can result in the inhibition of related items in memory, the present research examined whether retrieval-induced forgetting could provide a mechanism for explaining misinformation effects. Specifically, the authors found in their first study that the inhibition of critical items rendered the recollection of postevent information more likely in a subsequent test of memory. The authors established in their second study that when guided retrieval practice and final recall tests were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge and misinformation effects were absent. In contrast, a delay of 24 hr between initial encoding and guided retrieval practice produced not only retrieval-induced forgetting but also misinformation effects.
LanguageEnglish
Pages127-142
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

Fingerprint

Communication
Research
Inhibition (Psychology)
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • errors
  • forgetting
  • human information storage
  • memory
  • suggestibility

Cite this

@article{324c9e5a09d34f23b1110d5fd847b612,
title = "New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: the role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects",
abstract = "Extending recent work that has demonstrated that the act of remembering can result in the inhibition of related items in memory, the present research examined whether retrieval-induced forgetting could provide a mechanism for explaining misinformation effects. Specifically, the authors found in their first study that the inhibition of critical items rendered the recollection of postevent information more likely in a subsequent test of memory. The authors established in their second study that when guided retrieval practice and final recall tests were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge and misinformation effects were absent. In contrast, a delay of 24 hr between initial encoding and guided retrieval practice produced not only retrieval-induced forgetting but also misinformation effects.",
keywords = "errors, forgetting, human information storage, memory, suggestibility",
author = "Jo Saunders and Malcolm MacLeod",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "127--142",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied",
issn = "1076-898X",
number = "2",

}

New evidence on the suggestibility of memory : the role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. / Saunders, Jo; MacLeod, Malcolm.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 8, No. 2, 03.2002, p. 127-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - New evidence on the suggestibility of memory

T2 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

AU - Saunders, Jo

AU - MacLeod, Malcolm

PY - 2002/3

Y1 - 2002/3

N2 - Extending recent work that has demonstrated that the act of remembering can result in the inhibition of related items in memory, the present research examined whether retrieval-induced forgetting could provide a mechanism for explaining misinformation effects. Specifically, the authors found in their first study that the inhibition of critical items rendered the recollection of postevent information more likely in a subsequent test of memory. The authors established in their second study that when guided retrieval practice and final recall tests were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge and misinformation effects were absent. In contrast, a delay of 24 hr between initial encoding and guided retrieval practice produced not only retrieval-induced forgetting but also misinformation effects.

AB - Extending recent work that has demonstrated that the act of remembering can result in the inhibition of related items in memory, the present research examined whether retrieval-induced forgetting could provide a mechanism for explaining misinformation effects. Specifically, the authors found in their first study that the inhibition of critical items rendered the recollection of postevent information more likely in a subsequent test of memory. The authors established in their second study that when guided retrieval practice and final recall tests were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge and misinformation effects were absent. In contrast, a delay of 24 hr between initial encoding and guided retrieval practice produced not only retrieval-induced forgetting but also misinformation effects.

KW - errors

KW - forgetting

KW - human information storage

KW - memory

KW - suggestibility

U2 - 10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127

DO - 10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 127

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

SN - 1076-898X

IS - 2

ER -