'Neutrality', 'choice', and 'ownership' in the construction, use, and adaptation of judicial decision support systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the character and future of Judicial Decision Support Systems (JDSS's) in relation to the activity of judicial sentencing. There are many varieties of JDSS which could be applied to sentencing. However, in terms of attracting judicial and political commitment 'Sentencing Information Systems' seem to be emerging as the predominant JDSS model. This model stresses values of data neutrality; judicial choice; and, judicial ownership of sentencing practice and sentencing reform. The article proceeds to examine the 'flip side' of each of these values. It discusses the reasons for the apparent neutrality of SIS data arguing that this 'neutrality' is necessarily a construction based in sentencing research. Examining the value of judicial choice in whether or not the system should be consulted, the article presents results of evaluation of the extent and nature of use of the Scottish Sentencing Information System currently being operated by High Court judges. There is some reason to believe that previous Canadian experience may not necessarily be replicated elsewhere, although it is still early in the history of the Scottish project. Finally, the article considers the ability to retain judicial ownership of the system and public access arguing
LanguageEnglish
Pages143-166
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

neutrality
information system
Values
open channel
political activity
system model
reform
ability
history
evaluation
experience

Keywords

  • judicial decision support system
  • sentencing information systems
  • sentencing

Cite this

@article{6581f65f166646829b3915c17d63da57,
title = "'Neutrality', 'choice', and 'ownership' in the construction, use, and adaptation of judicial decision support systems",
abstract = "This article examines the character and future of Judicial Decision Support Systems (JDSS's) in relation to the activity of judicial sentencing. There are many varieties of JDSS which could be applied to sentencing. However, in terms of attracting judicial and political commitment 'Sentencing Information Systems' seem to be emerging as the predominant JDSS model. This model stresses values of data neutrality; judicial choice; and, judicial ownership of sentencing practice and sentencing reform. The article proceeds to examine the 'flip side' of each of these values. It discusses the reasons for the apparent neutrality of SIS data arguing that this 'neutrality' is necessarily a construction based in sentencing research. Examining the value of judicial choice in whether or not the system should be consulted, the article presents results of evaluation of the extent and nature of use of the Scottish Sentencing Information System currently being operated by High Court judges. There is some reason to believe that previous Canadian experience may not necessarily be replicated elsewhere, although it is still early in the history of the Scottish project. Finally, the article considers the ability to retain judicial ownership of the system and public access arguing",
keywords = "judicial decision support system, sentencing information systems, sentencing",
author = "Cyrus Tata",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1093/ijlit/6.2.143",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "143--166",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Information Technology",
issn = "0967-0769",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Neutrality', 'choice', and 'ownership' in the construction, use, and adaptation of judicial decision support systems

AU - Tata, Cyrus

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This article examines the character and future of Judicial Decision Support Systems (JDSS's) in relation to the activity of judicial sentencing. There are many varieties of JDSS which could be applied to sentencing. However, in terms of attracting judicial and political commitment 'Sentencing Information Systems' seem to be emerging as the predominant JDSS model. This model stresses values of data neutrality; judicial choice; and, judicial ownership of sentencing practice and sentencing reform. The article proceeds to examine the 'flip side' of each of these values. It discusses the reasons for the apparent neutrality of SIS data arguing that this 'neutrality' is necessarily a construction based in sentencing research. Examining the value of judicial choice in whether or not the system should be consulted, the article presents results of evaluation of the extent and nature of use of the Scottish Sentencing Information System currently being operated by High Court judges. There is some reason to believe that previous Canadian experience may not necessarily be replicated elsewhere, although it is still early in the history of the Scottish project. Finally, the article considers the ability to retain judicial ownership of the system and public access arguing

AB - This article examines the character and future of Judicial Decision Support Systems (JDSS's) in relation to the activity of judicial sentencing. There are many varieties of JDSS which could be applied to sentencing. However, in terms of attracting judicial and political commitment 'Sentencing Information Systems' seem to be emerging as the predominant JDSS model. This model stresses values of data neutrality; judicial choice; and, judicial ownership of sentencing practice and sentencing reform. The article proceeds to examine the 'flip side' of each of these values. It discusses the reasons for the apparent neutrality of SIS data arguing that this 'neutrality' is necessarily a construction based in sentencing research. Examining the value of judicial choice in whether or not the system should be consulted, the article presents results of evaluation of the extent and nature of use of the Scottish Sentencing Information System currently being operated by High Court judges. There is some reason to believe that previous Canadian experience may not necessarily be replicated elsewhere, although it is still early in the history of the Scottish project. Finally, the article considers the ability to retain judicial ownership of the system and public access arguing

KW - judicial decision support system

KW - sentencing information systems

KW - sentencing

U2 - 10.1093/ijlit/6.2.143

DO - 10.1093/ijlit/6.2.143

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 143

EP - 166

JO - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

T2 - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

JF - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

SN - 0967-0769

IS - 2

ER -