Neutral thermal sensation or dynamic thermal comfort? Numerical and field test analysis of a thermal chair

Sally Shahzad, John Kaiser Calautit, Angelo I. Aquino, Diana SNM Nasir, Ben Richard Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neutral thermal sensation is considered as the measure of thermal comfort in research, as when participants report feeling neutral regarding the thermal environment, they are considered as thermally comfortable. This is taken for granted, and although a few researchers have criticised the matter, still researchers use thermal sensation and the neutral point to assess the thermal conditions in their studies. This study questions the application of thermal neutrality and consequently poses a question on the findings of all the studies that only rely on it. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied in an open plan office in the UK in the winter of 2014. Participants were provided with a thermal chair and before and after using the chair, their views of comfort were recorded, including the ASHRAE seven point scale of thermal sensation, thermal preference, comfort, and satisfaction. The thermal environment was measured and compared against the ASHRAE Standard 55-2013. In addition, numerical modelling was also conducted to investigated the airflow and thermal distribution around the proposed thermal chair with a seated occupant. The results indicated that overall, 72% of the respondents, who did not feel neutral (thermal sensation) before or after using the thermal chair reported to feel comfortable and 65% reported to be satisfied. The results indicated that a neutral thermal sensation does not guarantee thermal comfort of the occupants and that thermal comfort is dynamic and other thermal sensations need to be considered. This study recommends the use of multiple methods (e.g. thermal, preference, decision, comfort, and satisfaction) to assess thermal comfort more accurately. Also, it questions the findings of any research that solely relies on thermal sensation and particularly on the neutral thermal sensation to assess thermal comfort of the occupants. The results also emphasised the importance of the application of numerical modelling in evaluating the thermal performance of the chair.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2189-2194
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume142
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2017
Event9th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2017 - Cardiff, United Kingdom
Duration: 21 Aug 201724 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Thermal comfort
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • neutral thermal sensation
  • thermal chair
  • thermal comfort
  • thermal control
  • workplace

Cite this

Shahzad, Sally ; Calautit, John Kaiser ; Aquino, Angelo I. ; Nasir, Diana SNM ; Hughes, Ben Richard. / Neutral thermal sensation or dynamic thermal comfort? Numerical and field test analysis of a thermal chair. In: Energy Procedia. 2017 ; Vol. 142. pp. 2189-2194.
@article{384a49b56e50462d8ce7e1fa86ca16ff,
title = "Neutral thermal sensation or dynamic thermal comfort? Numerical and field test analysis of a thermal chair",
abstract = "Neutral thermal sensation is considered as the measure of thermal comfort in research, as when participants report feeling neutral regarding the thermal environment, they are considered as thermally comfortable. This is taken for granted, and although a few researchers have criticised the matter, still researchers use thermal sensation and the neutral point to assess the thermal conditions in their studies. This study questions the application of thermal neutrality and consequently poses a question on the findings of all the studies that only rely on it. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied in an open plan office in the UK in the winter of 2014. Participants were provided with a thermal chair and before and after using the chair, their views of comfort were recorded, including the ASHRAE seven point scale of thermal sensation, thermal preference, comfort, and satisfaction. The thermal environment was measured and compared against the ASHRAE Standard 55-2013. In addition, numerical modelling was also conducted to investigated the airflow and thermal distribution around the proposed thermal chair with a seated occupant. The results indicated that overall, 72{\%} of the respondents, who did not feel neutral (thermal sensation) before or after using the thermal chair reported to feel comfortable and 65{\%} reported to be satisfied. The results indicated that a neutral thermal sensation does not guarantee thermal comfort of the occupants and that thermal comfort is dynamic and other thermal sensations need to be considered. This study recommends the use of multiple methods (e.g. thermal, preference, decision, comfort, and satisfaction) to assess thermal comfort more accurately. Also, it questions the findings of any research that solely relies on thermal sensation and particularly on the neutral thermal sensation to assess thermal comfort of the occupants. The results also emphasised the importance of the application of numerical modelling in evaluating the thermal performance of the chair.",
keywords = "neutral thermal sensation, thermal chair, thermal comfort, thermal control, workplace",
author = "Sally Shahzad and Calautit, {John Kaiser} and Aquino, {Angelo I.} and Nasir, {Diana SNM} and Hughes, {Ben Richard}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.587",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "2189--2194",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",

}

Neutral thermal sensation or dynamic thermal comfort? Numerical and field test analysis of a thermal chair. / Shahzad, Sally; Calautit, John Kaiser; Aquino, Angelo I.; Nasir, Diana SNM; Hughes, Ben Richard.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 142, 31.12.2017, p. 2189-2194.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neutral thermal sensation or dynamic thermal comfort? Numerical and field test analysis of a thermal chair

AU - Shahzad, Sally

AU - Calautit, John Kaiser

AU - Aquino, Angelo I.

AU - Nasir, Diana SNM

AU - Hughes, Ben Richard

PY - 2017/12/31

Y1 - 2017/12/31

N2 - Neutral thermal sensation is considered as the measure of thermal comfort in research, as when participants report feeling neutral regarding the thermal environment, they are considered as thermally comfortable. This is taken for granted, and although a few researchers have criticised the matter, still researchers use thermal sensation and the neutral point to assess the thermal conditions in their studies. This study questions the application of thermal neutrality and consequently poses a question on the findings of all the studies that only rely on it. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied in an open plan office in the UK in the winter of 2014. Participants were provided with a thermal chair and before and after using the chair, their views of comfort were recorded, including the ASHRAE seven point scale of thermal sensation, thermal preference, comfort, and satisfaction. The thermal environment was measured and compared against the ASHRAE Standard 55-2013. In addition, numerical modelling was also conducted to investigated the airflow and thermal distribution around the proposed thermal chair with a seated occupant. The results indicated that overall, 72% of the respondents, who did not feel neutral (thermal sensation) before or after using the thermal chair reported to feel comfortable and 65% reported to be satisfied. The results indicated that a neutral thermal sensation does not guarantee thermal comfort of the occupants and that thermal comfort is dynamic and other thermal sensations need to be considered. This study recommends the use of multiple methods (e.g. thermal, preference, decision, comfort, and satisfaction) to assess thermal comfort more accurately. Also, it questions the findings of any research that solely relies on thermal sensation and particularly on the neutral thermal sensation to assess thermal comfort of the occupants. The results also emphasised the importance of the application of numerical modelling in evaluating the thermal performance of the chair.

AB - Neutral thermal sensation is considered as the measure of thermal comfort in research, as when participants report feeling neutral regarding the thermal environment, they are considered as thermally comfortable. This is taken for granted, and although a few researchers have criticised the matter, still researchers use thermal sensation and the neutral point to assess the thermal conditions in their studies. This study questions the application of thermal neutrality and consequently poses a question on the findings of all the studies that only rely on it. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied in an open plan office in the UK in the winter of 2014. Participants were provided with a thermal chair and before and after using the chair, their views of comfort were recorded, including the ASHRAE seven point scale of thermal sensation, thermal preference, comfort, and satisfaction. The thermal environment was measured and compared against the ASHRAE Standard 55-2013. In addition, numerical modelling was also conducted to investigated the airflow and thermal distribution around the proposed thermal chair with a seated occupant. The results indicated that overall, 72% of the respondents, who did not feel neutral (thermal sensation) before or after using the thermal chair reported to feel comfortable and 65% reported to be satisfied. The results indicated that a neutral thermal sensation does not guarantee thermal comfort of the occupants and that thermal comfort is dynamic and other thermal sensations need to be considered. This study recommends the use of multiple methods (e.g. thermal, preference, decision, comfort, and satisfaction) to assess thermal comfort more accurately. Also, it questions the findings of any research that solely relies on thermal sensation and particularly on the neutral thermal sensation to assess thermal comfort of the occupants. The results also emphasised the importance of the application of numerical modelling in evaluating the thermal performance of the chair.

KW - neutral thermal sensation

KW - thermal chair

KW - thermal comfort

KW - thermal control

KW - workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041552092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-procedia

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.587

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.587

M3 - Conference article

VL - 142

SP - 2189

EP - 2194

JO - Energy Procedia

T2 - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -