TY - JOUR
T1 - Negotiating boundaries of care
T2 - an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the relational conflicts surrounding home mechanical ventilation following traumatic spinal cord injury
AU - Dickson, A.
AU - Karatzias, T.
AU - Gullone, A.
AU - Grandison, G.
AU - Allan, D.
AU - Park, J.
AU - Flowers, P.
PY - 2018/4/25
Y1 - 2018/4/25
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the phenomena of mechanical ventilation following traumatic spinal cord injury from three simultaneous perspectives; patients who require full-time mechanical ventilation (n = 8), their informal family carers (n = 8)and their formal carers (n = 11). We focus upon the intra and interpersonal challenges of establishing boundaries within the triad. Design: Qualitative study. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis(IPA). In order to encapsulate the inter-subjective, multidimensional and relational aspects of the experience, we focused on recurrent themes which were independently reported across all three participant groups. Results: One major inter-connected recurrent theme was identified: 1) ‘Negotiating boundaries of care and finding a “fit”’. It centres around establishing a ‘line’, or a boundary, which was imperative for retaining a sense of independence (for patients), a sense of home and privacy (for informal carers) and difficulties balancing complex care provision with the needs of family members so as not to cross that ‘line’ (for formal carers).Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for focussing on a ‘fit’ within the triad, balancing boundaries of care in order to establish a productive, satisfactory psycho-social environment for all three participant groups to live and/or work within. Recommendations for both future care provision and future research are suggested.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the phenomena of mechanical ventilation following traumatic spinal cord injury from three simultaneous perspectives; patients who require full-time mechanical ventilation (n = 8), their informal family carers (n = 8)and their formal carers (n = 11). We focus upon the intra and interpersonal challenges of establishing boundaries within the triad. Design: Qualitative study. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis(IPA). In order to encapsulate the inter-subjective, multidimensional and relational aspects of the experience, we focused on recurrent themes which were independently reported across all three participant groups. Results: One major inter-connected recurrent theme was identified: 1) ‘Negotiating boundaries of care and finding a “fit”’. It centres around establishing a ‘line’, or a boundary, which was imperative for retaining a sense of independence (for patients), a sense of home and privacy (for informal carers) and difficulties balancing complex care provision with the needs of family members so as not to cross that ‘line’ (for formal carers).Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for focussing on a ‘fit’ within the triad, balancing boundaries of care in order to establish a productive, satisfactory psycho-social environment for all three participant groups to live and/or work within. Recommendations for both future care provision and future research are suggested.
KW - carer
KW - IPA
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - negotiating boundaries
KW - qualitative
KW - spinalcord injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055022481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21642850.2018.1462708
DO - 10.1080/21642850.2018.1462708
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055022481
VL - 6
SP - 120
EP - 135
JO - Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
JF - Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
IS - 1
ER -