Negative emotional states, life adversity and interrogative suggestibility

Allan Mcgroarty, Heather Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interrogative suggestibility has been shown to vary according to cognitive and personality factors and if reliably measured may predict performance in real forensic interviews. It is therefore of both theoretical and practical interest to identify which psychological factors are most closely related to suggestible responding. This study examines the extent to which individual differences in negative emotional states predict performance on a measure of interrogative suggestibility and also tests the assumption that self-reports of negative life events are associated with suggestibility. A non-clinical sample (N=80) of participants was administered the brief form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Life Experiences Survey (LES) and the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS-1). Negative emotional states were found to correlate positively, although moderately, with all of the suggestibility measures. Multiple regression analyses found significant predictive models emerged for Yield 1, Yield 2 and Total Suggestibility. Each of these predicted a small proportion of the variance. Negative life event impact ratings were not associated with interrogative suggestibility. The findings suggest that brief self-report measures of negative emotional states are limited as predictors of interrogative suggestibility. The results also call into question the predictive utility of traditional checklist measures of life adversity for forensic purposes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages287–299
Number of pages13
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Self Report
Life Change Events
Checklist
Individuality
Personality
Anxiety
Regression Analysis
Interviews
Depression
Psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • emotional states
  • interrogative suggestibility
  • life adversity

Cite this

@article{a637cb31d91046a5a92d68675bc799a4,
title = "Negative emotional states, life adversity and interrogative suggestibility",
abstract = "Interrogative suggestibility has been shown to vary according to cognitive and personality factors and if reliably measured may predict performance in real forensic interviews. It is therefore of both theoretical and practical interest to identify which psychological factors are most closely related to suggestible responding. This study examines the extent to which individual differences in negative emotional states predict performance on a measure of interrogative suggestibility and also tests the assumption that self-reports of negative life events are associated with suggestibility. A non-clinical sample (N=80) of participants was administered the brief form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Life Experiences Survey (LES) and the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS-1). Negative emotional states were found to correlate positively, although moderately, with all of the suggestibility measures. Multiple regression analyses found significant predictive models emerged for Yield 1, Yield 2 and Total Suggestibility. Each of these predicted a small proportion of the variance. Negative life event impact ratings were not associated with interrogative suggestibility. The findings suggest that brief self-report measures of negative emotional states are limited as predictors of interrogative suggestibility. The results also call into question the predictive utility of traditional checklist measures of life adversity for forensic purposes.",
keywords = "emotional states, interrogative suggestibility, life adversity",
author = "Allan Mcgroarty and Heather Thomson",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02046.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "287–299",
journal = "Legal and Criminological Psychology",
issn = "1355-3259",
number = "2",

}

Negative emotional states, life adversity and interrogative suggestibility. / Mcgroarty, Allan; Thomson, Heather.

In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 14.03.2012, p. 287–299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative emotional states, life adversity and interrogative suggestibility

AU - Mcgroarty, Allan

AU - Thomson, Heather

PY - 2012/3/14

Y1 - 2012/3/14

N2 - Interrogative suggestibility has been shown to vary according to cognitive and personality factors and if reliably measured may predict performance in real forensic interviews. It is therefore of both theoretical and practical interest to identify which psychological factors are most closely related to suggestible responding. This study examines the extent to which individual differences in negative emotional states predict performance on a measure of interrogative suggestibility and also tests the assumption that self-reports of negative life events are associated with suggestibility. A non-clinical sample (N=80) of participants was administered the brief form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Life Experiences Survey (LES) and the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS-1). Negative emotional states were found to correlate positively, although moderately, with all of the suggestibility measures. Multiple regression analyses found significant predictive models emerged for Yield 1, Yield 2 and Total Suggestibility. Each of these predicted a small proportion of the variance. Negative life event impact ratings were not associated with interrogative suggestibility. The findings suggest that brief self-report measures of negative emotional states are limited as predictors of interrogative suggestibility. The results also call into question the predictive utility of traditional checklist measures of life adversity for forensic purposes.

AB - Interrogative suggestibility has been shown to vary according to cognitive and personality factors and if reliably measured may predict performance in real forensic interviews. It is therefore of both theoretical and practical interest to identify which psychological factors are most closely related to suggestible responding. This study examines the extent to which individual differences in negative emotional states predict performance on a measure of interrogative suggestibility and also tests the assumption that self-reports of negative life events are associated with suggestibility. A non-clinical sample (N=80) of participants was administered the brief form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Life Experiences Survey (LES) and the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS-1). Negative emotional states were found to correlate positively, although moderately, with all of the suggestibility measures. Multiple regression analyses found significant predictive models emerged for Yield 1, Yield 2 and Total Suggestibility. Each of these predicted a small proportion of the variance. Negative life event impact ratings were not associated with interrogative suggestibility. The findings suggest that brief self-report measures of negative emotional states are limited as predictors of interrogative suggestibility. The results also call into question the predictive utility of traditional checklist measures of life adversity for forensic purposes.

KW - emotional states

KW - interrogative suggestibility

KW - life adversity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883418313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02046.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02046.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 287

EP - 299

JO - Legal and Criminological Psychology

T2 - Legal and Criminological Psychology

JF - Legal and Criminological Psychology

SN - 1355-3259

IS - 2

ER -