Multiple phonetically trained-listener comparisons of speech before and after articulatory intervention in two children with repaired submucous cleft palate

Zoe Roxburgh, Joanne Cleland, James M. Scobbie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Cleft Palate (CP) assessments based on phonetic transcription are the "gold standard" therapy outcome measure, despite reliability difficulties. Here we propose a novel perceptual evaluation, applied to ultrasound-visual biofeedback (U-VBF) therapy and therapy using visual articulatory models (VAMs) for two children with repaired submucous CP.
Three comparisons were made: post VAM, post U-VBF and overall pre- and post-therapy. Twenty-two phonetically-trained listeners were asked to determine whether pre- or post-therapy recordings sounded "closer to the English target", using their own implicit stored knowledge (prompted via orthographic representation) as a comparison. Results are compared with segment-oriented percent target consonant correct (PTCC) derived from phonetic transcriptions by the authors.
Listener judgments and PTCC suggest that both children made improvements using both VAM and U-VBF. Statistical analysis showed listener agreement across all three comparisons, despite agreement being poor. This perceptual evaluation offers a straightforward method of evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and can be used by phonetically trained or lay listeners.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages34
JournalClinical linguistics & phonetics
Early online date22 Feb 2016
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Cleft Palate
listener
Phonetics
phonetics
Therapeutics
gold standard
Therapy
Listeners
evaluation
statistical analysis
recording
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Ultrasound

Keywords

  • ultrasound
  • visual articulatory models
  • perceptual speech evaluation
  • cleft palate

Cite this

@article{8886d2a492084b5abfb68b94ca93100f,
title = "Multiple phonetically trained-listener comparisons of speech before and after articulatory intervention in two children with repaired submucous cleft palate",
abstract = "In Cleft Palate (CP) assessments based on phonetic transcription are the {"}gold standard{"} therapy outcome measure, despite reliability difficulties. Here we propose a novel perceptual evaluation, applied to ultrasound-visual biofeedback (U-VBF) therapy and therapy using visual articulatory models (VAMs) for two children with repaired submucous CP. Three comparisons were made: post VAM, post U-VBF and overall pre- and post-therapy. Twenty-two phonetically-trained listeners were asked to determine whether pre- or post-therapy recordings sounded {"}closer to the English target{"}, using their own implicit stored knowledge (prompted via orthographic representation) as a comparison. Results are compared with segment-oriented percent target consonant correct (PTCC) derived from phonetic transcriptions by the authors. Listener judgments and PTCC suggest that both children made improvements using both VAM and U-VBF. Statistical analysis showed listener agreement across all three comparisons, despite agreement being poor. This perceptual evaluation offers a straightforward method of evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and can be used by phonetically trained or lay listeners.",
keywords = "ultrasound, visual articulatory models, perceptual speech evaluation, cleft palate",
author = "Zoe Roxburgh and Joanne Cleland and Scobbie, {James M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "22",
language = "English",
journal = "Clinical linguistics & phonetics",
issn = "0269-9206",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple phonetically trained-listener comparisons of speech before and after articulatory intervention in two children with repaired submucous cleft palate

AU - Roxburgh, Zoe

AU - Cleland, Joanne

AU - Scobbie, James M.

PY - 2016/2/22

Y1 - 2016/2/22

N2 - In Cleft Palate (CP) assessments based on phonetic transcription are the "gold standard" therapy outcome measure, despite reliability difficulties. Here we propose a novel perceptual evaluation, applied to ultrasound-visual biofeedback (U-VBF) therapy and therapy using visual articulatory models (VAMs) for two children with repaired submucous CP. Three comparisons were made: post VAM, post U-VBF and overall pre- and post-therapy. Twenty-two phonetically-trained listeners were asked to determine whether pre- or post-therapy recordings sounded "closer to the English target", using their own implicit stored knowledge (prompted via orthographic representation) as a comparison. Results are compared with segment-oriented percent target consonant correct (PTCC) derived from phonetic transcriptions by the authors. Listener judgments and PTCC suggest that both children made improvements using both VAM and U-VBF. Statistical analysis showed listener agreement across all three comparisons, despite agreement being poor. This perceptual evaluation offers a straightforward method of evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and can be used by phonetically trained or lay listeners.

AB - In Cleft Palate (CP) assessments based on phonetic transcription are the "gold standard" therapy outcome measure, despite reliability difficulties. Here we propose a novel perceptual evaluation, applied to ultrasound-visual biofeedback (U-VBF) therapy and therapy using visual articulatory models (VAMs) for two children with repaired submucous CP. Three comparisons were made: post VAM, post U-VBF and overall pre- and post-therapy. Twenty-two phonetically-trained listeners were asked to determine whether pre- or post-therapy recordings sounded "closer to the English target", using their own implicit stored knowledge (prompted via orthographic representation) as a comparison. Results are compared with segment-oriented percent target consonant correct (PTCC) derived from phonetic transcriptions by the authors. Listener judgments and PTCC suggest that both children made improvements using both VAM and U-VBF. Statistical analysis showed listener agreement across all three comparisons, despite agreement being poor. This perceptual evaluation offers a straightforward method of evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and can be used by phonetically trained or lay listeners.

KW - ultrasound

KW - visual articulatory models

KW - perceptual speech evaluation

KW - cleft palate

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iclp20

M3 - Article

JO - Clinical linguistics & phonetics

T2 - Clinical linguistics & phonetics

JF - Clinical linguistics & phonetics

SN - 0269-9206

ER -