TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research
AU - Larkin, Michael
AU - Shaw, Rachel
AU - Flowers, Paul
PY - 2019/4/3
Y1 - 2019/4/3
N2 - Researchers using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) within applied research typically use homogenous samples exploring shared perspectives on a single phenomenon of interest. This article explores the challenges and opportunities involved with developing rigorous and epistemologically coherent research designs for capturing more complex and systemic experiential phenomena, through the use of multiple perspectives to explore the same phenomenon. We outline a series of multiple perspective designs and analytic procedures that can be adapted and used across many diverse settings and populations. Whilst building upon existing approaches within qualitative methods and IPA, these designs and procedures are intended to scaffold clear routes to practical application, psychological intervention, the design of behaviour change interventions, and other recommendations for policy and practice. We discuss a variety of conceptual antecedents which situate these designs within phenomenology, pluralistic idiography, qualitative psychology, and wider debates within psychology and other social and behavioural sciences.
AB - Researchers using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) within applied research typically use homogenous samples exploring shared perspectives on a single phenomenon of interest. This article explores the challenges and opportunities involved with developing rigorous and epistemologically coherent research designs for capturing more complex and systemic experiential phenomena, through the use of multiple perspectives to explore the same phenomenon. We outline a series of multiple perspective designs and analytic procedures that can be adapted and used across many diverse settings and populations. Whilst building upon existing approaches within qualitative methods and IPA, these designs and procedures are intended to scaffold clear routes to practical application, psychological intervention, the design of behaviour change interventions, and other recommendations for policy and practice. We discuss a variety of conceptual antecedents which situate these designs within phenomenology, pluralistic idiography, qualitative psychology, and wider debates within psychology and other social and behavioural sciences.
KW - impact
KW - IPA
KW - methodology
KW - multiple-perspectives
KW - systemic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057318748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2018.1540655
DO - 10.1080/14780887.2018.1540655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057318748
SN - 1478-0887
VL - 16
SP - 182
EP - 198
JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology
JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology
IS - 2
ER -